Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions. | The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions. | ||
==Historical Perspective== | ==Historical Perspective== | ||
The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions. <ref name="pmid25377321">{{cite journal |vauthors=Levi M, van der Poll T |title=A short contemporary history of disseminated intravascular coagulation |journal=Semin. Thromb. Hemost. |volume=40 |issue=8 |pages=874–80 |date=November 2014 |pmid=25377321 |doi=10.1055/s-0034-1395155 |url=}}</ref>Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was first reported in the 19th century. As DIC is generally associated with an adverse outcome by most clinicians, and its acronym has been synonymous with “death is coming.”<ref name="pmid14576251">{{cite journal |vauthors=Toh CH, Dennis M |title=Disseminated intravascular coagulation: old disease, new hope |journal=BMJ |volume=327 |issue=7421 |pages=974–7 |date=October 2003 |pmid=14576251 |pmc=259170 |doi=10.1136/bmj.327.7421.974 |url=}}</ref> | |||
== | |||
== | |||
== | |||
== | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 14:09, 25 September 2018
Disseminated intravascular coagulation Microchapters |
Differentiating Disseminated intravascular coagulation from other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective |
FDA on Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective |
CDC on Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective |
Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective in the news |
Blogs on Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Disseminated intravascular coagulation |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omer Kamal, M.D.[2]
Overview
The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions.
Historical Perspective
The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions. [1]Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was first reported in the 19th century. As DIC is generally associated with an adverse outcome by most clinicians, and its acronym has been synonymous with “death is coming.”[2]
References
- ↑ Levi M, van der Poll T (November 2014). "A short contemporary history of disseminated intravascular coagulation". Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 40 (8): 874–80. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1395155. PMID 25377321.
- ↑ Toh CH, Dennis M (October 2003). "Disseminated intravascular coagulation: old disease, new hope". BMJ. 327 (7421): 974–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7421.974. PMC 259170. PMID 14576251.