Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
Marjan Khan (talk | contribs) |
Marjan Khan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Thymic carcinoma}} | {{Thymic carcinoma}} | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{ | {{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{Marjan}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Other imaging studies for thymic carcinoma include FDG PET scan. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma than thymoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%).<ref name="NishinoAshiku2006">{{citejournal|last1=Nishino|first1=Mizuki|last2=Ashiku|first2=Simon K.|last3=Kocher|first3=Olivier N.|last4=Thurer|first4=Robert L.|last5=Boiselle|first5=Phillip M.|last6=Hatabu|first6=Hiroto|title=The Thymus: A Comprehensive Review1|journal=RadioGraphics|volume=26|issue=2|year=2006|pages=335–348|issn=0271-5333|doi=10.1148/rg.262045213}}</ref><ref name=OIF>Thymic Carcinoma. Radiopaedia. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/thymic-carcinoma. Accessed on 3rd January 2016.</ref>DG (Fludeoxyglucose) PET is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%) | Other imaging studies for thymic carcinoma include FDG PET scan. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma than thymoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%).<ref name="NishinoAshiku2006">{{citejournal|last1=Nishino|first1=Mizuki|last2=Ashiku|first2=Simon K.|last3=Kocher|first3=Olivier N.|last4=Thurer|first4=Robert L.|last5=Boiselle|first5=Phillip M.|last6=Hatabu|first6=Hiroto|title=The Thymus: A Comprehensive Review1|journal=RadioGraphics|volume=26|issue=2|year=2006|pages=335–348|issn=0271-5333|doi=10.1148/rg.262045213}}</ref><ref name=OIF>Thymic Carcinoma. Radiopaedia. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/thymic-carcinoma. Accessed on 3rd January 2016.</ref>DG (Fludeoxyglucose) PET is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:53, 28 June 2019
|
Thymic Carcinoma Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Case Studies |
|
Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Marjan Khan M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Other imaging studies for thymic carcinoma include FDG PET scan. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma than thymoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%).[1][2]DG (Fludeoxyglucose) PET is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%)
Other Imaging Findings
FDG PET
FDG (Fludeoxyglucose) PET is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%).[1][2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Template:Citejournal
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Thymic Carcinoma. Radiopaedia. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/thymic-carcinoma. Accessed on 3rd January 2016.