Chest pain other diagnostic studies

Chest pain Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Chest pain from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Chest Pain in Pregnancy
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
X-ray
Echocardiography and Ultrasound
CT scan
MRI
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Interventions
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Chest pain other diagnostic studies On the Web
Most recent articles
cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Chest pain other diagnostic studies
CDC on Chest pain other diagnostic studies
Chest pain other diagnostic studies in the news
Blogs on Chest pain other diagnostic studies
to Hospitals Treating Chest pain other diagnostic studies
Risk calculators and risk factors for Chest pain other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2] Aisha Adigun, B.Sc., M.D.[3]

Overview

Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA) is used to determine the presence and severity of a luminal obstruction of an epicardial coronary artery, including its location, length, and diameter, as well as coronary blood flow. ICA provides the characterization of high-grade obstructive stenosis and possibility for percutaneous or surgical revascularization. (IFR and FFR) provide physiologic characteristic of stenosis. Radiation exposure to the patient during an interventional procedure varied 4 to 10 mSv and is dependent on procedural duration and complexity. The spatial resolution of ICA is 0.3 mm; as such, it is impossible to visualize arterioles (diameter of 0.1 mm) that regulate myocardial blood flow. Coronary vascular functional studies can be performed during coronary angiography. In normal coronary angiography there may be evident abnormal coronary vascular function. Assessment of coronary microcirculation and coronary vasomotion by coronary function testing are reasonable.

Other Diagnostic Studies

• Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA) is used to determine the presence and severity of a luminal obstruction of an epicardial coronary artery, including its location, length, and diameter, as well as coronary blood flow.
• ICA provides the characterization of high-grade obstructive stenosis and the possibility for percutaneous or surgical revascularization.
• (IFR and FFR) provide physiologic characteristic of stenosis.
• Radiation exposure to the patient during an interventional procedure varied 4 to 10 mSv and is dependent on procedural duration and complexity.
• The spatial resolution of ICA is 0.3 mm; as such, it is impossible to visualize arterioles (diameter of 0.1 mm) that regulate myocardial blood flow.
• Coronary vascular functional studies can be performed during coronary angiography.
• In normal coronary angiography there may be evidence of abnormal coronary vascular function.
• Assessment of coronary microcirculation and coronary vasomotion by coronary function testing are reasonable.

Contraindications of stress test for diagnosis of acute chest pain

Exercise ECG	Stress Nuclear	400px	500px	600px
Abnormal ST changes on resting ECG, digoxin, left bundle branch block, Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern, ventricular paced rhythm (unless test is performed to establish exercise capacity and not for diagnosis of ischemia)	High-risk unstable angina, complicated ACS or AMI (<2 d)	Limited acoustic windows (in COPD patients) Inability to reach target heart rate	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px
Unable to achieve ≥5 METs or unsafe to exercise High-risk unstable angina or AMI (<2 days), ative ACS, Uncontrolled heart failure	Contraindications to vasodilator administration	Uncontrolled heart failure	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px
Significant cardiac arrhythmias (VT, complete atrioventricular block) or high risk for arrhythmias caused by QT prolongation	Significant arrhythmias (VT, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block) or sinus bradycardia <45 bpm	High-risk unstable angina, active ACS or AMI (<2 d) Serious ventricular arrhythmia or high risk for arrhythmias attributable to QT prolongation	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px
Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis	Significant hypotension (SBP <90 mm Hg)	Respiratory failure Severe COPD, acute pulmonary embolism, severe pulmonary hypertension	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px
Severe systemic arterial hypertension≥200/110 mmHg	Known or suspected bronchoconstriction or bronchospastic disease Severe systemic arterial hypertension (≥200/110 mm Hg)	Contraindications to dobutamine (if pharmacologic stress test needed) Atrioventricular block, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px
Acute illness ( acute pulmonary embolism, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditis, acute aortic dissection	Recent use of dipyridamole or dipyridamole containing medications Use of methylxanthines ( aminophylline, caffeine) within 12 h Known hypersensitivity to adenosine, regadenoson	Critical aortic stenosis Acute illness (acute pulmonary embolism, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditis, acute aortic dissection)	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px
		Hemodynamically significant LV outflow tract obstruction Contraindications of atropine use: Narrow-angle glaucoma Myasthenia gravis Obstructive uropathy Obstructive gastrointestinal disorders Severe systemic arterial hypertension ≥200/110mmHg	The width of this column is 500px	The width of this column is 600px