Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Sara Zand (talk | contribs)
/* 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities (DO NOT EDIT){{cite journal |vauthors=Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, DiMarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NA, Ferguson TB, Hammill SC, Karasik PE, Link MS, Marine JE, Schoenfeld MH, Sha...
Tag: Replaced
Sara Zand (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:


==Indications==
==Indications==
==2021 ESC Guideline for management of [[acute heart failure]]==
<span style="font-size:85%">'''Abbreviations:'''
'''AHF:''' [[Acute heart failure]];
'''LMWH:''' [[Low-molecular-weight heparin]];
'''PaO2:''' [[Partial pressure of oxygen]] ;
'''SBP:''' [[Systolic blood pressure]];
'''SpO2:''' [[Transcutaneous oxygen saturation]];
</span>
<br>
{| style="cellpadding=0; cellspacing= 0; width: 600px;"
|-
| style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #4682B4; color: #FFFFFF;" align=center |'''Recommendations for [[cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation]] in [[patients]] with [[heart failure]]'''
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left | ''' ([[ 2021 ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class I, Level of Evidence A]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[CRT]] is recommended for symptomatic [[patients]] with [[HF]] in [[sinus rhythm]] with a [[QRS duration]] >_150 ms and [[LBBB]] [[QRS]] morphology and with [[LVEF]] <_35%
despite [[optimal medical therapy]] in order to improve [[symptoms]] and reduce [[morbidity]] and [[mortality]].<br>
❑ [[CRT]] rather than [[RV pacing]] is recommended for [[patients]] with [[HFrEF]] regardless of [[NYHA]] class or [[QRS]] duration who have an indication for [[ventricular]] pacing for [[high degree AV block]] in order to reduce[[ morbidity]] including [[AF]]
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left | '''  ([[ 2021 ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class IIa, Level of Evidence B]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[CRT]] should be considered for symptomatic [[patients]] with [[HF]] in [[sinus rhythm]] with a [[QRS]] duration >_150 ms and non-[[LBBB]] [[QRS]] morphology and
with [[LVEF]] <_35% despite [[OMT]] in order to improve [[symptoms]] and reduce [[morbidity]] and [[mortality]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Diuretics]] :([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class I, Level of Evidence C]]) :'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ Intravenous [[loop diuretics]] are considered for all admitted [[patients]] with [[acute heart failure]] presented  with [[signs]], [[symptoms]] of [[fluid]] overload<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Diuretics]] : ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class IIa, Level of Evidence B]])'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ In [[patients]] with resistant [[edema]] who do not respond to an increase in [[loop diuretic]] doses, combination of a [[loop diuretic]] with [[thiazide]] type [[diuretic]] should be considered <br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Vasodilators]]: ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class IIb, Level of Evidence B]])'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ In order to improve [[symptoms]] and reduce [[congestion]] in  [[patients]] with [[AHF]] and SBP >110 mmHg, [[vasodilators]] may be considered as initial therapy<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Inotropic agents]] : ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class 2b, Level of Evidence C]])'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[Inotropic]] agents may be considered in [[patients]] with [[SBP]] <90 mmHg and evidence of [[hypoperfusion]] without response to fluid challenge, to improve peripheral
[[perfusion]] and maintain [[end-organ]] function<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left | '''[[Inotropic]] agents ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|Class III, Level of Evidence C]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑  Routinely administration of [[inotropic]] agents are not recommended , due to safety concerns, unless the [[patient]] has [[symptomatic hypotension]] and evidence of [[hypoperfusion]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Vasopressors]]: ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|ClassIIb, Level of Evidence B]])'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ In [[patients]] with [[cardiogenic shock]], a [[vasopressor]], preferably [[norepinephrine]], may be indicated to increase [[blood pressure]] and vital [[organ]] perfusion<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Anticoagulant therapy]]: ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|ClassI, Level of Evidence A]])'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[Thromboembolism prophylaxis]] such as [[LMWH]] is recommended in [[patients]] not already [[anticoagulated]] and no contraindication to [[anticoagulation]], to prevent the risk of [[deep venous thrombosis]] and [[pulmonary embolism]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Opiates]]: ([[ESC guidelines classification scheme|ClassIII, Level of Evidence C]])'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[Opiates]] is not routinely recommended, unless in selected [[patients]] with severe, intractable [[pain]] or [[anxiety]]<br>
|-
|}
{|
! colspan="2" style="background: PapayaWhip;" align="center" + |The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline
|-
|}<ref name="pmid34447992">{{cite journal |vauthors=McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A |title=2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure |journal=Eur Heart J |volume=42 |issue=36 |pages=3599–3726 |date=September 2021 |pmid=34447992 |doi=10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 |url=}}</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}

Revision as of 06:06, 25 February 2022

Cardiac resynchronization therapy Microchapters

Home

Overview

Indications

Landmark Trials

Contraindications

Pathophysiologic Basis for CRT

Treatment

Preoperative Evaluation

Procedure

Recovery

Outcomes and Prognosis

Complications

Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications

CDC on Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications

Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications in the news

Blogs on Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications

Directions to Hospitals Administering Cardiac resynchronization therapy

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cardiac resynchronization therapy indications

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Bhaskar Purushottam, M.D. [2], Hardik Patel, M.D.

Overview

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) is indicated in patients who have an LVEF less than or equal to 35%, left bundle branch block (LBBB) with a QRS duration greater than or equal to 0.15 seconds, and normal sinus rhythm, for the treatment of NYHA functional Class III or ambulatory Class IV heart failure symptoms in patients whose medical therapy has been optimized.

Indications

2021 ESC Guideline for management of acute heart failure

Abbreviations: AHF: Acute heart failure; LMWH: Low-molecular-weight heparin; PaO2: Partial pressure of oxygen ; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; SpO2: Transcutaneous oxygen saturation;

Recommendations for cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with heart failure
(Class I, Level of Evidence A):

CRT is recommended for symptomatic patients with HF in sinus rhythm with a QRS duration >_150 ms and LBBB QRS morphology and with LVEF <_35% despite optimal medical therapy in order to improve symptoms and reduce morbidity and mortality.
CRT rather than RV pacing is recommended for patients with HFrEF regardless of NYHA class or QRS duration who have an indication for ventricular pacing for high degree AV block in order to reducemorbidity including AF

(Class IIa, Level of Evidence B):

CRT should be considered for symptomatic patients with HF in sinus rhythm with a QRS duration >_150 ms and non-LBBB QRS morphology and with LVEF <_35% despite OMT in order to improve symptoms and reduce morbidity and mortality

Diuretics :(Class I, Level of Evidence C) :

❑ Intravenous loop diuretics are considered for all admitted patients with acute heart failure presented with signs, symptoms of fluid overload

Diuretics : (Class IIa, Level of Evidence B)

❑ In patients with resistant edema who do not respond to an increase in loop diuretic doses, combination of a loop diuretic with thiazide type diuretic should be considered

Vasodilators: (Class IIb, Level of Evidence B)

❑ In order to improve symptoms and reduce congestion in patients with AHF and SBP >110 mmHg, vasodilators may be considered as initial therapy

Inotropic agents : (Class 2b, Level of Evidence C)

Inotropic agents may be considered in patients with SBP <90 mmHg and evidence of hypoperfusion without response to fluid challenge, to improve peripheral perfusion and maintain end-organ function

Inotropic agents (Class III, Level of Evidence C):

❑ Routinely administration of inotropic agents are not recommended , due to safety concerns, unless the patient has symptomatic hypotension and evidence of hypoperfusion

Vasopressors: (ClassIIb, Level of Evidence B)

❑ In patients with cardiogenic shock, a vasopressor, preferably norepinephrine, may be indicated to increase blood pressure and vital organ perfusion

Anticoagulant therapy: (ClassI, Level of Evidence A)

Thromboembolism prophylaxis such as LMWH is recommended in patients not already anticoagulated and no contraindication to anticoagulation, to prevent the risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

Opiates: (ClassIII, Level of Evidence C)

Opiates is not routinely recommended, unless in selected patients with severe, intractable pain or anxiety

The above table adopted from 2021 ESC Guideline

[1]

References

  1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland J, Coats A, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam C, Lyon AR, McMurray J, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano G, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A (September 2021). "2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure". Eur Heart J. 42 (36): 3599–3726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. PMID 34447992 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)

Template:WH Template:WS CME Category::Cardiology