Mental disorder: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
{{Mental disorder}}
{{Mental disorder}}
{{CMG}}
{{CMG}}
== Diagnosis ==
Many [[mental health professionals]], particularly psychiatrists, seek to [[diagnose]] individuals by ascertaining their particular mental disorder. Some professionals, for example some [[clinical psychologists]], may avoid diagnosis in favor of other assessment methods such as formulation of a client's difficulties and circumstances.<ref>Kinderman, P. and Lobban, F. (2000) Evolving formulations: Sharing complex information with clients. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(3), 307-310.</ref> The majority of mental health problems are actually assessed and treated by family physicians during consultations, who may refer on for more specialist diagnosis in acute or chronic cases. Routine diagnostic practice in mental health services typically involves an interview (which may be referred to as a [[mental status examination]]), where judgements are made of the interviewee's appearance and behavior, self-reported symptoms, mental health history, and current life circumstances. The views of relatives or other third parties may be taken into account. A physical examination to check for ill health or the effects of medications or other drugs may be conducted. [[Psychological testing]] is sometimes used via paper-and-pen or computerized questionnaires, which may include [[algorithms]] based on ticking off standardized diagnostic criteria, and in relatively rare specialist cases neuroimaging tests may be requested, but these methods are more commonly found in research studies than routine clinical practice.<ref>HealthWise (2004) [http://health.yahoo.com/topic/mentalhealth/symptoms/medicaltest/healthwise/tp16780 Mental Health Assessment.] Yahoo! Health</ref><ref>Davies, T. (1997) [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7093/1536 ABC of mental health: Mental health assessment] ''British Medical Journal 314:1536</ref> Time and budgetary constraints often limit practicing psychiatrists from conducting more thorough diagnostic evaluations.<ref>Kashner TM, Rush AJ, Surís A, Biggs MM, Gajewski VL, Hooker DJ, Shoaf T, Altshuler KZ. (2003) Impact of structured clinical interviews on physicians' practices in community mental health settings. Psychiatr Serv. 2003 May;54(5):712-8. PMID 12719503</ref> It has been found that most clinicians evaluate patients using an unstructured, open-ended approach, with limited training in evidence-based assessment methods, and that inaccurate diagnosis may be common in routine practice.<ref>Shear MK, Greeno C, Kang J, Ludewig D, Frank E, Swartz HA, Hanekamp M. (2000) Diagnosis of nonpsychotic patients in community clinics. ''Am J Psychiatry.'' Apr;157(4):581-7 PMID 10739417</ref>
[[Comorbidity]] is very usual with mental disorders, i.e. same person can suffer one or more disorder. The work for fifth version of [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] (DSM-V)
<ref>[http://www.dsm5.org/ DSM-V Prelude Project website]</ref> has raised some questions about dimensional diagnostic criteria compared to categorical diagnostic criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology (Vol 114, Issue 4) <ref>[http://content.apa.org/journals/abn/114/4 Journal of Abnormal Psychology - Vol 114, Issue 4]</ref> devoted a whole issue to discuss about categorical and dimensional diagnostic criteria. In short it the argument is that diagnosis of mental disorder can be based on several overlapping dimensions and not categorical and/or two-dimensional classes. One possibility in diagnosis is to have several (>2) dimensions overlapping and that it is harder to describe. In the following picture idea is that multiple dimension lines are crossed with one diagnostic line and the combination of crossing points is basis for a diagnosis.<br>
[[Image:Multidimensional diagnosis.JPG|center]]
In practical clinical settings it might be problematic to find several disorders in different dimensions and also differentiate the position of specific disorder in its dimensional axis like the picture indicates.


== Differential Diagnosis ==  
== Differential Diagnosis ==  

Revision as of 16:38, 23 August 2012

Mental disorder
MeSH D001523

Mental disorder Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Mental Disorder from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Psychotherapy

Surgery

Prevention

Social Impacts

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Mental disorder On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Mental disorder

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Mental disorder

CDC on Mental disorder

Mental disorder in the news

Blogs on Mental disorder

Directions to Hospitals Treating Mental disorder

Risk calculators and risk factors for Mental disorder

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Differential Diagnosis

In alphabetical order. [1] [2]

Anxiety Disorders

Childhood Disorders

Cognitive Disorders

Eating Disorders

Mood Disorders

  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Cyclothymic disorder
  • Dysthymic disorder
  • Major depressive disorder

Personality Disorders

  • Antisocial personality
  • Borderline personality
  • Dependent personality
  • Histrionic personality
  • Obsessive-compulsive personality

Schizophrenia (and other)

  • Brief psychotic disorder
  • Delusional disorder
  • Psychotic disorders
  • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Schizophreniform disorder
  • Shared psychotic disorder

Substance-Related Disorders

  • Alcoholism
  • Amphetamines
  • Cannabis
  • Cocaine
  • Hallucinogens
  • Inhalants
  • Nicotine
  • Opinoids
  • Phencyclidines
  • Sedatives

Treatment

Mental health services may be based in hospitals, clinics or the community. Often an individual may engage in different treatment modalities. They may be under case management (sometimes referred to as "service coordination"), use inpatient or day treatment, utilize a psychosocial rehabilitation program, and/or take part in an Assertive Community Treatment program. Individuals may be treated against their will in some cases, especially if assessed to be at high risk to themselves or others. Services in some countries are increasingly based on a Recovery model that supports an individual's journey to regain a meaningful life.

Psychotherapy

A major option for many mental disorders is psychotherapy. There are several main types. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely used and is based on modifying the patterns of thought and behavior associated with a particular disorder. Psychoanalysis, addressing underlying psychic conflicts and defenses, has been a dominant school of psychotherapy and is still in use. Systemic therapy or family therapy is sometimes used, addressing a network of signicant others as well as an individual. Some psychotherapies are based on a humanistic approach. There are a number of specific therapies used for particular disorders, which may be offshoots or hybrids of the above types. Mental health professionals often employ an eclectic or integrative approach. Much may depend on the therapeutic relationship, and there may be problems with trust, confidentiality and engagement.

Medication

A major option for many mental disorders is psychiatric medication. There are several main groups. Antidepressants are used for the treatment of clinical depression as well as often for anxiety and other disorders. There are a number of antidepressants beginning with the tricylics, moving through a wide variety of drugs that modify various facets of the brain chemistry dealing with intercellular communication. Beta-blockers, developed as a heart medication, is also used as an antidepressant. Anxiolytics are used for anxiety disorders and related problems such as insomnia. Mood stabilizers are used primarily in bipolar disorder. Lithium A(a metal) and Lamictal (an epileptic drug) are notable for treating both mania and depression. The others, mainly targeting mania rather than depression, are a wide variety of epilepsy medications and antipsychotics. Antipsychotics are used for psychotic disorders, notably for positive symptoms in schizophrenia. Stimulants are commonly used, notably for ADHD. Despite the different conventional names of the drug groups, there can be considerable overlap in the kinds of disorders for which they are actually indicated. There may also be off-label use. There can be problems with adverse effects and adherence.

Other

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is sometimes used in severe cases when other interventions for severe intractable depression have failed. Psychosurgery, best known as the form known as a "frontal lobotomy", is no longer generally used. Psychoeducation may be used to provide people with the information to understand and manage their problems. Creative therapies are sometimes used, including music therapy, art therapy or drama therapy. Lifestyle adjustments and supportive measures are often used, including peer support, self-help and supported housing or employment. Some advocate dietary supplements based on published randomized double-blind, placebo controlled trials[3]. Many things have been found to help at least some people. A placebo effect may play a role in any intervention.

Prognosis

There is substantial variation over time between disorders, and between individuals. Functional ability may also vary across different domains. There may be remission of symptoms, but also relapse. Rates of recovery vary. A number of individual and social factors have been linked to prognosis.

Despite often being characterized in purely negative terms, mental disorders can involve above-average creativity, non-conformity, goal-striving, meticulousness, or empathy.[4] The public perception of the level of disability associated with mental disorders can change.[5]

Prevalence

WHO estimated that about 450 million people worldwide currently suffer from some form of mental or behavioural disorder.[6] One in four people will suffer from mental illness at some time in life, according to a report from the WHO.[7][8]

Numerous large-scale surveys of the prevalence of mental disorders in adults in the general population have been carried out since the 1980s based on self-reported symptoms assessed by standardized structured interviews, usually carried out over the phone. Mental disorders have been found to be common, with over a third of people in most countries reporting sufficient criteria at some point in their life.[9] The World Health Organization is currently undertaking a global survey of 26 countries in all regions of the world, based on ICD and DSM criteria.[2] The first published figures on the 14 country surveys completed to date, indicate that, of those disorders assessed, anxiety disorders are the most common in all but 1 country (prevalence in the prior 12-month period of 2.4% to 18.2%) and mood disorders next most common in all but 2 countries (12-month prevalence of 0.8% to 9.6%), while substance disorders (0.1%-6.4%) and impulse-control disorders (0.0%-6.8%) were consistently less prevalent. The United States, Colombia, the Netherlands and Ukraine tended to have higher prevalence estimates across most classes of disorder, while Nigeria, Shanghai and Italy were consistently low, and prevalence was lower in Asian countries in general. Cases of disorder were rated as mild (prevalence of 1.8%-9.7%), moderate (prevalence of 0.5%-9.4%) and serious (prevalence of 0.4%-7.7%).[10] However, these are widely believed to be underestimates, due to poor diagnosis (especially in countries without affordable access to mental health services) and low reporting rates, in part because of the predominant use of self-report data, rather than semi-structured instruments such as the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID); actual lifetime prevalence rates for mental disorders are estimated to be between 65% and 85%.

A review that pooled surveys in different countries up to 2004 found overall average prevalence estimates for any anxiety disorder of 10.6% (in the 12 months prior to assessment) and 16.6% (in lifetime prior to assessment), but that rates for individual disorders varied widely. Women had generally higher prevalence rates than men, but the magnitude of the difference varied.[11] A review that pooled surveys of mood disorders in different countries up to 2000 found 12-month prevalence rates of 4.1% for major depressive disorder (MDD), 2% for dysthymic disorder and 0.72% for bipolar 1 disorder. The average lifetime prevalence found was 6.7% for MDD (with a relatively low lifetime prevalence rate in higher-quality studies, compared to the rates typically highlighted of 5%-12% for men and 10%-25% for women), and rates of 3.6% for dysthymia and 0.8% for Bipolar 1.[12]

Previous widely cited large-scale surveys in the United States were the Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) survey and subsequent National Comorbidity Survey (NCS). The NCS was replicated and updated between 2000 and 2003 and indicated that, of those groups of disorders assessed, nearly half of Americans (46.4%) reported meeting criteria at some point in their life for either a DSM-IV anxiety disorder (28.8%), mood disorder (20.8%), impulse-control disorder (24.8%) or substance use disorders (14.6%). Half of all lifetime cases had started by age 14 years and 3/4 by age 24 years.[13] In the prior 12-month period only, around a quarter (26.2%) met criteria for any disorder - anxiety disorders 18.1%; mood disorders 9.5%; impulse control disorders 8.9%; and substance use disorders 3.8%. A substantial minority (23%) met criteria for more than two disorders. A minority (22.3%) of cases were classed as serious, 37.3% as moderate and 40.4% as mild.[14][15]

A 2004 cross-European study found that approximately one in four people reported meeting criteria at some point in their life for one of the DSM-IV disorders assessed, which included mood disorders (13.9%), anxiety disorders (13.6%) or alcohol disorder (5.2%). Approximately one in ten met criteria within a 12-month period. Women and younger people of either gender showed more cases of disorder[16]

A 2005 review of 27 studies have found that 27% of adult Europeans is or has been affected by at least one mental disorder in the past 12 months. It was also found that the most frequent disorders were anxiety disorders, depressive, somatoform and substance dependence disorders.[17]

A 2005 review of prior surveys in 46 countries on the prevalence of schizophrenic disorders, including a prior 10-country WHO survey, found an average (median) figure of 0.4% for lifetime prevalence up to the point of assessment and 0.3% in the 12-month period prior to assessment. A related figure not given in other studies (known as lifetime morbid risk), reported to be an accurate statement of how many people would theoretically develop schizophrenia at any point in life regardless of time of assessment, was found to be “about seven to eight individuals per 1,000.” (0.7/0.8%). The prevalence of schizophrenia was consistently lower in poorer countries than in richer countries (though not the incidence) but the prevalence did not differ between urban/rural areas or men/women (although incidence did).[18]

Studies of the prevalence of personality disorders (PDs) have been fewer and smaller-scale, but a broader Norwegian survey found a similar overall prevalence of almost 1 in 7 (13.4%), based on meeting personality criteria over the prior five year period. Rates for specific disorders ranged from 0.8% to 2.8%, with rates differing across countries, and by gender, educational level and other factors[19] A US survey that incidentally screened for personality disorder found an overal rate of 14.79%.[20]

Approximately 7% of a preschool pediatric sample were given a psychiatric diagnosis in one clinical study, and approximately 10% of 1- and 2-year-olds receiving developmental screening have been assessed as having significant emotional/behavioral problems based on parent and pediatrician reports.[21]

Professions and fields

A number of professions have developed that specialise in the treatment of mental disorders, including the medical speciality of psychiatry (including psychiatric nursing)[22][23][24], the division of psychology known as clinical psychology[25], Social Work[26], as well as Mental Health Counselors, Marriage and Family Therapists, Psychotherapists, Counselors and Public Health professionals. Those with personal experience of using mental health services are also increasingly involved in researching and delivering mental health services and working as mental health professionals.[27][28][29][30] The different clinical and scientific perspectives draw on diverse fields of research and theory, and different disciplines may favor differing models, explanations and goals.[4]

Movements

The Consumer/Survivor Movement (also known as user/survivor movement) is made up of individuals (and organizations representing them) who are clients of mental health services or who consider themselves "survivors" of mental health services. The movement campaigns for improved mental health services and for more involvement and empowerment within mental health services, policies and wider society.[31][32][33] Patient advocacy organizations have expanded with increasing deinstitutionalization in developed countries, working to challenge the stereotypes, stigma and exclusion associated with psychiatric conditions. An antipsychiatry movement fundamentally challenges mainstream psychiatric theory and practice, including the reality or utility of psychiatric diagnoses of mental illnesses.[34][35] [36]

Laws and policies

Three quarters of countries around the world have mental health legislation. Compulsory admission to mental health facilities (also known as Involuntary commitment or sectioning), is a controversial topic. From some points of view it can impinge on personal liberty and the right to choose, and carry the risk of abuse for political, social and other reasons; from other points of view, it can potentially prevent harm to self and others, and assist some people in attaining their right to healthcare when unable to decide in their own interests.[37]

All human-rights orientated mental health laws require proof of the presence of a mental disorder as defined by internationally accepted standards, but the type and severity of disorder that counts can vary in different jurisdictions. The two most often utilized grounds for involuntary admission are said to be serious likelihood of immediate or imminent danger to self or others, and the need for treatment. Applications for someone to be involuntarily admitted may usually come from a mental health practitioner, a family member, a close relative, or a guardian. Human-rights-orientated laws usually stipulate that independent medical practitioners or other accredited mental health practitioners must examine the patient separately and that there should be regular, time-bound review by an independent review body.[37] An individual must be shown to lack the capacity to give or withhold informed consent (i.e. to understand treatment information and its implications). Proxy consent (also known as substituted decision-making) may be given to a personal representative, a family member or a legally appointed guardian, or patients may have been able to enact an advance directive as to how they wish to be treated.[37] The right to supported decision-making may also be included in legislation.[38] Involuntary treatment laws may be extended to those living in the community, for example Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) are used in New Zealand, Australia and 38 states in the US and are being planned in the UK.[39]

The World Health Organization reports that in many instances national mental health legislation takes away the rights of persons with mental disorders rather than protecting rights, and is often outdated.[37] In 1991, the United Nations adopted the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care, which established minimum human rights standards of practice in the mental health field. In 2006 the UN formally agreed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to protect and enhance the rights and opportunities of disabled people, including those with psychosocial disabilities[40]

The term insanity, sometimes used colloquially as a synonym for mental illness, is often used technically as a legal term.

Perception and discrimination

Media

Media coverage of mental illness comprises predominantly negative depictions, for example, of incompetence, violence or criminality, with far less coverage of positive issues such as accomplishments or human rights issues.[41][42][43] Such negative depictions, including in children's cartoons, are thought to contribute to stigma and negative attitudes in the public and in those with mental health problems themselves, although more sensitive or serious cinematic portrayals have increased in prevalence.[44][45]

General public

The general public have been found to hold a strong stereotype of dangerousness and desire for social distance from individuals described as mentally ill.[46] Japan has been reported to have more negative attitudes than Australia, although stigma appears common in both countries.[47]

Violence

The public fear of violence due to mental illness is a contentious topic. One US national survey indicated that a far higher percentage of Americans rated individuals described as displaying the characteristics of a mental disorder (for example Schizophrenia or Substance Use Disorder) as "likely to do something violent to others" compared to those described as being 'troubled'.[48] Research indicates, on balance, a higher than average number of violent acts by some individuals with certain diagnoses, notably antisocial or psychopathic personality disorders, but conflicting findings about specific symptoms (for example links between psychosis and violence in community settings) - but the mediating factors of such acts are most consistently found to be mainly socio-demographic and socio-economic factors such as being young, male, of lower socio-economic status and, in particular, substance abuse (including alcohol).[49][50][4] Findings consistently indicate that it is many times more likely that people diagnosed with a serious mental illness living in the community will be the victim rather than the perpetrator of violence.[49][51] Violence by or against individuals with mental illness typically occurs in the context of complex social interactions (including in atmosphere of mutually high "expressed emotion"), including within a family setting,[52] as well as being an issue in healthcare settings[53] and the wider community.[54]

Employment

Employment discrimination is reported to play a significant part in the high rate of unemployment among those with a diagnosis of mental illness[55] Schemes to combat stigma have been prioritized by global and national psychiatric organizations, but their methods and outcomes have been criticized as counterproductive.[56]

See also

Notes

  1. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:77 ISBN 1591032016
  2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:68 ISBN 140510368X
  3. Lakhan SE; Vieira KF. Nutritional therapies for mental disorders. Nutrition Journal 2008;7(2).
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Rogers, A. & Pilgram, D. (2005) A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness, Open University Press, 3rd Edition. ISBN 0335215831
  5. Ferney, V. (2003) The Hierarchy of Mental Illness: Which diagnosis is the least debilitating? New York City Voices Jan/March
  6. WHO | The world health report
  7. Mental Health Care in the Developing World
  8. Mental problems 'hit one in four'
  9. WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders Bulletin of the World Health Organization v.78 n.4
  10. WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium. (2004) Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA. Jun 2;291(21):2581-90.
  11. Somers JM, Goldner EM, Waraich P, Hsu L. (2006) Prevalence and incidence studies of anxiety disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry. Feb;51(2):100-13.
  12. Waraich P, Goldner EM, Somers JM, Hsu L. (2004) Prevalence and incidence studies of mood disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry. Feb;49(2):124-38.
  13. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. (2005) Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Jun;62(6):593-602.
  14. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters, EE. (2005) Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Jun;62(6):617-27.
  15. US National Institute of Mental Health (2006) The Numbers Count: Mental Disorders in America Retrieved May 2007
  16. ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators, European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) Project. (2004) Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Suppl. (420):21-7.
  17. Wittchen, H.U. and Jacobi, F. (2005). Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe - a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 15, 4, pp. 357-76.
  18. Saha S, Chant D, Welham J, McGrath J. (2005) A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e141.
  19. Torgersen S, Kringlen E, Cramer V. (2001) The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001
  20. Grant BF, Hasin DS, Stinson FS, Dawson DA,Chou SP, Ruan WJ, Pickering RP. (2004) Prevalence, correlates, and disability of personality disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. Jul;65(7):948-58.
  21. Carter, AS., Briggs-Gowan, MJ. & Davis, NO. (2004) Assessment of young children's social-emotional development and psychopathology: recent advances and recommendations for practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. Jan;45(1):109-34.
  22. A, N.C. (1997). What is Psychiatry? The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 591-593.
  23. University of Melbourne. (2005, August 19). What is Psychiatry?. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.psychiatry.unimelb.edu.au/info/what_is_psych.html
  24. California Psychiatric Association. (2007, February 28). Frequently Asked Questions About Psychiatry & Psychiatrists. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.calpsych.org/publications/cpa/faqs.html
  25. American Psychological Association, Division 12, http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/aboutcp.html
  26. Golightley, M. (2004) Social work and Mental Health Learning Matters, UK
  27. Goldstrom ID, Campbell J, Rogers JA, et al (2006) National estimates for mental health mutual support groups, self-help organizations, and consumer-operated services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33:92–102
  28. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (1998) The experiences of mental health service users as mental health professionals
  29. Chamberlin J. (2005) User/consumer involvement in mental health service delivery. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. Jan-Mar;14(1):10-4. PMID 15792289
  30. Terence V. McCann, John Baird, Eileen Clark, Sai Lu (2006) Beliefs about using consumer consultants in inpatient psychiatric units International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 15 (4), 258–265.
  31. Everett, B. (1994) Something is happening: the contemporary consumer and psychiatric survivor movement in historical context. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 15:55–7
  32. Rissmiller DJ & Rissmiller JH (2006) Evolution of the antipsychiatry movement into mental health consumerism. Psychiatric Services, Jun;57(6):863-6.
  33. Oaks, D. (2006) The Evolution of the Consumer Movement Psychiatric Services 57:1212
  34. The Antipsychiatry Coalition. (2005, November 26). The Antipsychiatry Coalition. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from www.antipsychiatry.org
  35. Anthony Paul O'Brien, Martin Woods, Christine Palmer (2001) The emancipation of nursing practice: Applying anti-psychiatry to the therapeutic community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing 10 (1), 3–9.
  36. Weitz D. (2003) Call me antipsychiatry activist--not "consumer" Ethical Hum Sci Serv. Spring;5(1):71-2. PMID 15279009
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.3 World Health Organization (2005) WHO Resource Book on Mental Health: Human rights and legislation ISBN 924156282 (PDF)
  38. Manitoba Family Services and Housing. The Vulnerable Persons Living with a Mental Disability Act, 1996
  39. The Big Question: Will the new mental health Bill make Britain a safer place?
  40. ENABLE website UN section on disability
  41. Coverdate, J., Nairn, R. & Claasen, D. (2001) Depictions of mental illness in print media: a prospective national sample Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36 (5), 697–700.
  42. Edney, RD. (2004) Mass Media and Mental Illness: A Literature Review Canadian Mental Health Association
  43. Diefenbach, D.L. (1998) The portrayal of mental illness on prime-time television Journal of Community Psychology Vol 25, Issue 3, Pages 289-302
  44. Sieff, E. (2003) Media frames of mental illnesses: The potential impact of negative frames Journal of Mental Health, Vol 12(3) pp. 259-269
  45. Wahl, O.F. (2003) News Media Portrayal of Mental Illness: Implications for Public Policy American Behavioral Scientist Vol. 46, No. 12, 1594-1600
  46. Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA. (1999) Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Health. Sep;89(9):1328-33.
  47. Griffiths KM, Nakane Y, Christensen H, Yoshioka K, Jorm AF, Nakane H. (2006) Stigma in response to mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan. BMC Psychiatry. May 23;6:21.
  48. Pescosolido BA, Monahan J, Link BG, Stueve A, Kikuzawa S. (1999) The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems. American Journal of Public Health. Sep;89(9):1339-45.
  49. 49.0 49.1 Stuart, H. (2003) Violence and mental illness: an overview. World Psychiatry. June; 2(2): 121–124
  50. Steadman HJ, Mulvey EP, Monahan J, Robbins PC, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Roth LH, Silver E. (1998) Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry. May;55(5):393-401.
  51. Brekke JS, Prindle C, Bae SW, Long JD (2001). Risks for individuals with schizophrenia who are living in the community. Psychiatric Services. Oct;52(10):1358–66. PMID 11585953
  52. Solomon, PL., Cavanaugh, MM., Gelles, RJ. (2005) Family Violence among Adults with Severe Mental Illness. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 6, No. 1, 40-54
  53. Chou, KR., Lu, RB., Chang, M. (2001) Assaultive behavior by psychiatric in-patients and its related factors. Journal of Nursing Research. Dec;9(5):139-51
  54. B. Lögdberg, L.-L. Nilsson, M. T. Levander, S. Levander (2004) Schizophrenia, neighbourhood, and crime. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110(2) Page 92.
  55. Heather Stuart (2006) Mental Illness and Employment Discrimination Current Opinion in Psychiatry 19(5):522-526.
  56. Read, J., Haslam, N., Sayce, L., Davies, E. (2006) Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the 'mental illness is an illness like any other' approach Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Nov;114(5):303-18

Further reading

  • Atkinson, J. (2006) Private and Public Protection: Civil Mental Health Legislation, Edinburgh, Dunedin Academic Press
  • Hockenbury, Don and Sandy (2004). Discovering Psychology. Worth Publishers. ISBN 0-7167-5704-4.
  • Roy Porter, Madness. A Brief History, Oxford University Press 2003
  • Wiencke, Markus (2006) Schizophrenie als Ergebnis von Wechselwirkungen: Georg Simmels Individualitätskonzept in der Klinischen Psychologie. In David Kim (ed.), Georg Simmel in Translation: Interdisciplinary Border-Crossings in Culture and Modernity (pp. 123-155). Cambridge Scholars Press, Cambridge, ISBN 1-84718-060-5

Template:Mental illness (alphabetical list)


ar:مرض عقلي zh-min-nan:Cheng-sîn-pēⁿ ca:Malaltia mental cs:Duševní porucha da:Psykisk sygdom de:Psychische Störung et:Psüühika- ja käitumishäired eu:Buruko gaitza gl:Enfermidade mental ko:정신과 질환 hi:मानसिक रोग he:הפרעה נפשית id:Penyakit mental is:Geðsjúkdómur lt:Psichikos sutrikimas nl:Psychische aandoening no:Psykisk lidelse uz:Ruhiy kasallik simple:Mental illness sk:Duševná choroba sl:Duševna motnja sr:Ментални поремећај sh:Duševna bolest sv:Psykisk störning uk:Психічні захворювання

Template:Jb1 Template:WH Template:WS