Sandbox: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
{{Abdominal aortic aneurysm}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{HP}}
==Overview==
[[Angiography]] is helpful in determining aortic anatomy and has been advocated for preoperative use if suspicion of suprarenal or thoracic aortic aneurysm, femoral or popliteal aneurysm, renal artery stenosis, unexplained impairment of renal function, occlusive iliofemoral disease, or visceral ischemia exists.
Angiography is limited by its invasiveness, cost, lack of operator availability, time involved, and risk of complications (eg, bleeding, perforation, embolization). Routine use of angiography in evaluation of AAA is not recommended.
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) requires less time, uses less contrast material, and is less invasive than conventional angiography. The technique is not widely available and offers no real advantage over conventional CT scanning.
'''Do Not Delete'''
'''Do Not Delete'''



Revision as of 17:26, 21 November 2012

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Sandbox On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Sandbox

CDC on Sandbox

Sandbox in the news

Blogs on Sandbox

Directions to Hospitals Treating Sandbox

Risk calculators and risk factors for Sandbox

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hardik Patel, M.D.

Overview

Angiography is helpful in determining aortic anatomy and has been advocated for preoperative use if suspicion of suprarenal or thoracic aortic aneurysm, femoral or popliteal aneurysm, renal artery stenosis, unexplained impairment of renal function, occlusive iliofemoral disease, or visceral ischemia exists.

Angiography is limited by its invasiveness, cost, lack of operator availability, time involved, and risk of complications (eg, bleeding, perforation, embolization). Routine use of angiography in evaluation of AAA is not recommended.

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) requires less time, uses less contrast material, and is less invasive than conventional angiography. The technique is not widely available and offers no real advantage over conventional CT scanning.







Do Not Delete

Shown below is a strip from a patient being cardioverted for atrial fibrillation. The patient was taking sotalol and coumadin. This is the first shock which was set at 150 joules and delivered via defibrillator pads placed with the positive in the V1 position and the negative on the back between the left scapula and the spine.


Hyperlipidemia

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hyperlipidemia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Triglycerides > 75th Percentile
 
 
NO
 
 
Type IIa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
YES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Types I, IIb, IV, V
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Cholesterol/Apo B ratio ≥ 6.2
 
 
NO
 
 
Types IIb, IV