Q fever epidemiology and demographics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Men are slightly more often affected than women, which most likely is attributed to different employment rates in typical professions. | Men are slightly more often affected than women, which most likely is attributed to different employment rates in typical professions. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 6 December 2012
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
|
Q fever Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Q fever epidemiology and demographics On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Q fever epidemiology and demographics |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Q fever epidemiology and demographics |
Epidemiology and demographics
In 1999, Q fever became a notifiable disease in the United States but reporting is not required in many other countries. Because the disease is underreported, scientists cannot reliably assess how many cases of Q fever have actually occurred worldwide. Many human infections are inapparent.
The pathogenic agent is to be found everywhere except Antarctica and New Zealand. In Europe it appears as hepatitis rather than pneumonia as in the United States. The bacterium is extremely sustainable and infectious: a single organism is able to cause an infection. The common way of infection is inhalation of contaminated dust, contact with contaminated milk, meat, wool and particularly birthing products. Ticks can transfer the pathogenic agent to other animals. Transfer between humans seems extremely rare and has so far been described in very few cases.
Men are slightly more often affected than women, which most likely is attributed to different employment rates in typical professions.