Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===FDG PET=== | ===FDG PET=== | ||
FDG (Fludeoxyglucose) PET is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a [[thymoma]] and [[thymic carcinoma]]. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%)<ref name="NishinoAshiku2006">{{citejournal|last1=Nishino|first1=Mizuki|last2=Ashiku|first2=Simon K.|last3=Kocher|first3=Olivier N.|last4=Thurer|first4=Robert L.|last5=Boiselle|first5=Phillip M.|last6=Hatabu|first6=Hiroto|title=The Thymus: A Comprehensive Review1|journal=RadioGraphics|volume=26|issue=2|year=2006|pages=335–348|issn=0271-5333|doi=10.1148/rg.262045213}}</ref> | FDG (Fludeoxyglucose) [[Positron emission tomography|PET]] is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a [[thymoma]] and [[thymic carcinoma]]. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%)<ref name="NishinoAshiku2006">{{citejournal|last1=Nishino|first1=Mizuki|last2=Ashiku|first2=Simon K.|last3=Kocher|first3=Olivier N.|last4=Thurer|first4=Robert L.|last5=Boiselle|first5=Phillip M.|last6=Hatabu|first6=Hiroto|title=The Thymus: A Comprehensive Review1|journal=RadioGraphics|volume=26|issue=2|year=2006|pages=335–348|issn=0271-5333|doi=10.1148/rg.262045213}}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 14:19, 28 February 2014
|
Thymic Carcinoma Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Case Studies |
|
Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Thymic carcinoma other imaging findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [2]
Other Imaging Findings
FDG PET
FDG (Fludeoxyglucose) PET is a useful image study that allows differentiation between a thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The standarized uptake value (SUV) in the FDG PET is much higher for the thymic carcinoma, with a high sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (92.3%)[1]