Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective

Revision as of 14:09, 25 September 2018 by Okamal (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Disseminated intravascular coagulation Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Disseminated intravascular coagulation from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiograph and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective

CDC on Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective

Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Risk calculators and risk factors for Disseminated intravascular coagulation historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omer Kamal, M.D.[2]

Overview

The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions.

Historical Perspective

The syndrome of DIC is well known in the medical literature for centuries, although a more precise description of the underlying mechanisms had to await the 20th century. Initial ideas on a role of the contact activation system as the primary trigger for the systemic activation of coagulation as well as a presumed hyperfibrinolytic response in DIC have been found to be misconceptions. [1]Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was first reported in the 19th century. As DIC is generally associated with an adverse outcome by most clinicians, and its acronym has been synonymous with “death is coming.”[2]

References

  1. Levi M, van der Poll T (November 2014). "A short contemporary history of disseminated intravascular coagulation". Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 40 (8): 874–80. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1395155. PMID 25377321.
  2. Toh CH, Dennis M (October 2003). "Disseminated intravascular coagulation: old disease, new hope". BMJ. 327 (7421): 974–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7421.974. PMC 259170. PMID 14576251.


Template:WS Template:WH