Coronary angiography film quality
Coronary Angiography | |
General Principles | |
---|---|
Anatomy & Projection Angles | |
Normal Anatomy | |
Anatomic Variants | |
Projection Angles | |
Epicardial Flow & Myocardial Perfusion | |
Epicardial Flow | |
Myocardial Perfusion | |
Lesion Complexity | |
ACC/AHA Lesion-Specific Classification of the Primary Target Stenosis | |
Lesion Morphology | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vanessa Cherniauskas, M.D. [2]
Coronary Angiography Film Quality
- Uninterpretable
- The primary endpoint cannot be analyzed secondary to exceedingly poor film exposure or quality (i.e. no images on the film, inadequate injection of contrast material, etc.).
- Poor
- The primary endpoint can be analyzed but the film quality is poor secondary to under or overexposure, poor panning, poor engagement, poor contrast injection, excess collimation, partial obscuration by diaphragm.
- Average
- Adequate film quality. In some, but not all views, distal panning is adequate to assess TIMI Flow Grade and/or TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade.
- Good
- Good film quality. During most injections there is adequate panning to assess flow to the distal vasculature and collaterals if present.
- Excellent
- Excellent film quality. There is adequate panning to assess flow to the distal vasculature of the infarct-related artery and collaterals if present. Dye is not injected prior to the beginning of the cinefilming.