Chancroid laboratory findings

Revision as of 20:26, 27 January 2016 by Nate Michalak (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chancroid Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Classification

Differentiating Chancroid from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Chancroid laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Chancroid laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA onChancroid laboratory findings

CDC onChancroid laboratory findings

Chancroid laboratory findingsin the news

Blogs onChancroid laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating chancroid

calculators and risk factors for Chancroid laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.; Nate Michalak, B.A.; Serge Korjian M.D.

Overview

Lack of rapid and reliable laboratory tests make diagnosis and treatment decisions based on microbiologic findings difficult. Available laboratory tests involve acquiring a sample of ulcer exudate and include: Gram stain, culture, and multiplex PCR (M-PCR).

Laboratory Findings

Gram Stain

  • Ulcer exudate can stained to typically reveal Gram-negative coccobacilli organized in a chain, so-called a "school of fish."[1]
  • Sensitivity of Gram stain is poor and cannot be used for definitive diagnosis.

Culture

  • Definitive diagnosis of chancroid requires culturing Haemophilus ducreyi from ulcer exudate.
  • H. ducreyi is a fastidious bacterium and is therefore difficult to culture. Most facilities do no have the required media or experience to culture the bacterium.[2]

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

  • A multiplex PCR (M-PCR) technique has been developed to amplify DNA from ulcer exudate and identify H. ducreyi.[3]
  • PCR tests have not yet been approved by the FDA.
  • PCR may not be practical due to the high cost of testing and slow availability of results.

Gallery

References

  1. A. K. Joseph & T. Rosen (1994). "Laboratory techniques used in the diagnosis of chancroid, granuloma inguinale, and lymphogranuloma venereum". Dermatologic clinics. 12 (1): 1–8. PMID 8143374. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Lewis, D A (2003). "Chancroid: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 79 (1): 68–71. doi:10.1136/sti.79.1.68. ISSN 1368-4973.
  3. Orle KA, Gates CA, Martin DH, Body BA, Weiss JB (1996). "Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers". J Clin Microbiol. 34 (1): 49–54. PMC 228728. PMID 8748271.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 "Public Health Image Library (PHIL)".

Template:WikiDoc Sources