Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a form of peritonitis that occurs in patients with advanced cirrhosis as a manifestation of severe derangement of hepatic function.
  • And so, an episode of SBP has been proposed as an indication for liver transplantation in the absence of contraindications.
  • It occurs in 10-30% of hospitalized patients with ascites.
  • SBP has been studied extensively since its first description in 1964 which has lead to a greater understanding of the disease and reduction in the mortality from 80-90% to 30% or less in the past 10 years likely due to earlier detection and effective, nontoxic therapy.
  • SBP has also been described to occur in various clinical settings, as in nephrotic syndrome or heart failure.
  • SBP has been diagnosed with a positive bacterial culture for a single organism and an AF ( ascitic fluid) polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count of >250mm3, in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection.
  • More than 60% of SBP episodes are caused by enteric gram-negative organisms like Escherichia coli.
  • Selective Intestinal Decontamination ( SID ) with fluorinated quinolones, to suppress the gram-negative intestinal flora has been known to reduce the incidence of SBP.
  • SBP is a result of culmination of the inability of the gut to contain bacteria and failure of the immune system to eradicate the organisms once they have escaped.
  • Predisposing factors for the AF infection in patients with Cirrhosis and ascites include:
    • Severity of the liver disease.
    • Serum total bilirubin level of >2.5 mg/dl.
    • Total protein level <1 g/dl.
    • Gasto-intestinal bleeding.
  • Clinical signs and symptoms do not distinguish secondary from spontaneous peritonitis.
  • AF analysis is helpful in differentiating SBP from secondary peritonitis which is a surgically treatable source of infection.
  • The symptoms observed most frequently are Fever and abdominal pain.
  • Because of this lack of specificity and sensitivity of clinical signs and symptoms, instances of unexplained deteri- oration in patients with cirrhosis should lead to a diagnostic paracentesis.
  • Once diagnosed, patients with SBP should receive prompt empiric antibiotic treatment ( Cephalosporins) without waiting for the AF culture results because a delay in antibiotic treatment may result in a significant and potentially fatal deterioration in the clinical status of the patient.
  • Prompt diagnosis and treatment maximize survival among patients with AF infections.
  • Repeat paracenteses for follow-up of patients with SBP are considered to rule out secondary peritonitis if there is no clinical response to the treatment and the infection is polymicrobial.
  • Those patients who survive an episode of SBP are at high risk of recurrence.
  • Bacterascites represents the colonization of AF with bacteria without a neutrocytic response.
    • Outcome depends on the clinical status of the patient:
      • Patients with newly developed abdominal pain and/or temperature >100F are more prone to progress to SBP and therefore should receive empiric antibiotic treatment as stated for SBP
  • Currently, there are essentially no deaths as a result of SBP, provided it is detected and treated before the development of shock or renal failure, which are the most frequent complications of this disease.

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis overview from Other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Natural History

Complications

Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Prevention

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources