Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology

Revision as of 06:55, 8 October 2020 by Sara Zand (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB5s85xDshA%7C350}}

Pre-eclampsia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pre-eclampsia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology

CDC on Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology

Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology in the news

Blogs on Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pre-eclampsia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pre-eclampsia pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ogheneochuko Ajari, MB.BS, MS [2]

Pathophysiology

chronic uteroplacental ischemia (53), immune maladaptation (53), very low-density lipoprotein toxicity (53), genetic imprinting (53), increased trophoblast apoptosis or necrosis (54, 55), and an exaggerated maternal inflammatory response to deported trophoblasts (56, 57). More recent observations suggest a possible role for imbalances of angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (58). It is possible that a combination of some of these purported mechanisms may be responsible and experimental evidence (61, 62) suggesting that uteroplacental ischemia leads to increased circulating concentrations of antiangiogenic factors and angiogenic imbalances (63).


Although much research into the etiology and mechanism of pre-eclampsia has taken place, its exact pathogenesis remains uncertain. Most studies support the notion of inadequate blood supply to the placenta making it release particular hormones or chemical agents that, in mothers predisposed to the condition, leads to damage of the endothelium (lining of blood vessels), alterations in metabolism, and inflammation.

Studies suggest that hypoxia resulting from inadequate perfusion upregulates sFlt-1, a VEGF and PlGF antagonist, leading to a damaged maternal endothelium and restriction of placental growth.[1] In addition, endoglin, a TGF-beta antagonist, is elevated in pregnant women who develop preeclampsia.[2] Soluble endoglin is likely upregulated by the placenta in response to an upregulation of cell-surface endoglin produced by the maternal immune system, although there is also the potential that sEng is produced by the maternal endothelium. Levels of both sFlt-1 and sEng increase as severity of disease increases, with levels of sEng surpassing levels of sFlt-1 in HELLP syndrome cases.

Both sFlt-1 and sEng are upregulated in all pregnant women to some extent, supporting the idea that hypertensive disease in pregnancy is a normal pregnancy adaptation gone awry. As natural killer cells are intimately involved in placentation and as placentation involves a degree of maternal tolerance for a foreign placenta which requires maternal resources for its support, it is not surprising that the maternal immune system might respond more negatively to the arrival of placentae under certain circumstances, such as a placenta which is more invasive than normal. Initial maternal rejection of the placental cytotrophoblasts may be the cause of the inadequately remodeled spiral arteries in those cases of preeclampsia associated with shallow implantation, leading to downstream hypoxia and the appearance of maternal symptoms in response to upregulated sFlt-1 and sEng. (See parent-offspring conflict.)

It has been documented that fetal cells such as fetal erythroblasts as well as cell-free fetal DNA are increased in the maternal circulation in women who develop preeclampsia. These findings have given rise to the hypothesis that preeclampsia is a disease process by which a placental lesion such as hypoxia allows increased fetal material into maternal circulation that leads to an inflammatory response and endothelial damage ultimately resulting in preeclampsia and eclampsia.[3]

Pre-eclampsia may develop at varying times within pregnancy and its progress differs among patients; most cases are diagnosed pre-term. It has no known cure apart from ending the pregnancy (induction of labor or abortion). It may also occur up to six weeks post-partum. Of dangerous pregnancy complications, it is the most common; it may affect both the mother and the fetus.

References

  1. Maynard S, Min J, Merchan J, Lim K, Li J, Mondal S, Libermann T, Morgan J, Sellke F, Stillman I, Epstein F, Sukhatme V, Karumanchi S (2003). "Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia". J Clin Invest. 111 (5): 649–58. PMID 12618519.
  2. Venkatesha, S (2006). "Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia". Nat Med. 12 (6): 642–9. PMID 16751767. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  3. Hahn S, Holzgreve W (2002). "Fetal cells and cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood: new insights into pre-eclampsia". Hum Reprod. 8 (6): 501–8. PMID 12498420.

Template:WH Template:WS