Thoracic aortic aneurysm ACC/ AHA guidelines for aortic imaging techniques
Thoracic aortic aneurysm Microchapters |
Differentiating Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm from other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Special Scenarios |
Case Studies |
Thoracic aortic aneurysm ACC/ AHA guidelines for aortic imaging techniques On the Web |
FDA on Thoracic aortic aneurysm ACC/ AHA guidelines for aortic imaging techniques |
CDC on Thoracic aortic aneurysm ACC/ AHA guidelines for aortic imaging techniques |
Thoracic aortic aneurysm ACC/ AHA guidelines for aortic imaging techniques in the news |
Blogs on Thoracic aortic aneurysm ACC/ AHA guidelines for aortic imaging techniques |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [2]
Overview
ACC/ AHA Guidelines for Aortic Imaging Techniques to determine the presence and progression of Thoracic aortic disease (DO NOT EDIT)
Class I |
1. Measurements of aortic diameter should be taken at reproducible anatomic landmarks, perpendicular to the axis of blood flow, and reported in a clear and consistent format. (Level of Evidence: C) |
2. For measurements taken by computed tomographic imaging or magnetic resonance imaging, the external diameter should be measured perpendicular to the axis of blood flow. For aortic root measurements, the widest diameter, typically at the mid-sinus level, should be used. (Level of Evidence: C) |
3. For measurements taken by echocardiography, the internal diameter should be measured perpendicular to the axis of blood flow. For aortic root measurements the widest diameter, typically at the mid-sinus level, should be used. (Level of Evidence: C) |
4. Abnormalities of aortic morphology should be recognized and reported separately even when aortic diameters are within normal limits. (Level of Evidence:C) |
5. The finding of aortic dissection, aneurysm, traumatic injury and/or aortic rupture should be immediately communicated to the referring physician. (Level of Evidence:C) |
6. Techniques to minimize episodic and cumulative radiation exposure should be utilized whenever possible. (Level of Evidence:) |
Class IIa |
1. If clinical information is available, it can be useful to relate aortic diameter to the patient's age and body size. (Level of Evidence:C) |
ACC/ AHA Guidelines - Recommendations for Aortic Imaging techniques in Genetic syndromes (DO NOT EDIT)
Class I |
1. An echocardiogram is recommended at the time of diagnosis of Marfan syndrome to determine the aortic root and ascending aortic diameters (see(Figure 5))and 6 months thereafter to determine the rate of enlargement of the aorta. (Level of Evidence: C) |
2. Annual imaging is recommended for patients with Marfan syndrome if stability of the aortic diameter is documented. If the maximal aortic diameter is 4.5 cm or greater, or if the aortic diameter shows significant growth from baseline, more frequent imaging should be considered (Level of Evidence: C) |
3. Patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome or a confirmed genetic mutation known to predispose to aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections (TGFBR1, TGFBR2, FBN1, ACTA2, or MYH11) should undergo complete aortic imaging at initial diagnosis and 6 months thereafter to establish if enlargement is occurring (Level of Evidence: C) |
4. Patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome should have yearly magnetic resonance imaging from the cerebrovascular circulation to the pelvis (Level of Evidence:B) |
5. Patients with Turner syndrome should undergo imaging of the heart and aorta for evidence of bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of the aorta, or dilatation of the ascending thoracic aorta. If initial imaging is normal and there are no risk factors for aortic dissection, repeat imaging should be performed every 5 to 10 years or if otherwise clinically indicated. If abnormalities exist, annual imaging or follow-up imaging should be done. (Level of Evidence:C) |
Class IIa |
1.It is reasonable to consider surgical repair of the aorta in all adult patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome or a confirmed TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 mutation and an aortic diameter of 4.2 cm or greater by transesophageal echocardiogram (internal diameter) or 4.4 to 4.6 cm or greater by computed tomographic imaging and/or magnetic resonance imaging (external diameter). (Level of Evidence:C) |
2.For women with Marfan syndrome contemplating pregnancy, it is reasonable to prophylactically replace the aortic root and ascending aorta if the diameter exceeds 4.0 cm. (Level of Evidence:C) |
3. If the maximal cross-sectional area in square centimeters of the ascending aorta or root divided by the patient's height in meters exceeds a ratio of 10, surgical repair is reasonable because shorter patients have dissection at a smaller size and 15% of patients with Marfan syndrome have dissection at a size smaller than 5.0 cm. (Level of Evidence:C) |
Class IIb |
a. In patients with Turner syndrome with additional risk factors, including bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of the aorta, and/or hypertension, and in patients who attempt to become pregnant or who become pregnant, it may be reasonable to perform imaging of the heart and aorta to help determine the risk of aortic dissection (Level of Evidence:C) |