Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics
Congenital Rubella Syndrome Microchapters |
Differentiating Congenital Rubella Syndrome from other Diseases |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics |
FDA on Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics |
CDC on Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics |
Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics in the news |
Blogs on Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Congenital rubella syndrome |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Congenital rubella syndrome epidemiology and demographics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Kalsang Dolma, M.B.B.S.[2]
Overview
Congenital rubella syndrome is rare in developed countries with strong immunization programs. It is endemic in other parts of the world
Epidemiology and Demographics
Developed Countries
Since 2001, the annual numbers of rubella cases have been low in United States ( 23 in 2001, 18 in 2002, 7 in 2003, and 9 in 2004). Nearly half of these cases are among the people who are born outside of US.[1]
Worldwide
Congenital rubella syndrome continues to be endemic in many parts of the world. It is estimated that more than 100,000 infants are born with CRS annually worldwide.[2] According to a survey of the member countries in the World Health Organization (WHO), the number of countries that have incorporated rubella-containing vaccines into their routine national immunization programs increased from 83 (13% of the birth cohort) in 1996 to 130 countries (40% of the birth cohort) in 2010.
References
- ↑ "www.cdc.gov" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-12-19.
- ↑ Robertson SE, Featherstone DA, Gacic-Dobo M, Hersh BS. Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome: global update. Revista panamericana de salud publica/Pan American journal of public health 2003;14(5):306–15.