Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3gene codes for the Muscle LIM Protein (MLP) or CSRP3, a small 194 amino acid protein, which is specifically expressed in skeletal muscles and cardiac muscle.[1][2] Since the identification of MLP, 20 years ago,[3] a multitude of studies have focused on delineating its functional significance.
The CSRP3 gene was discovered in rat in 1994.[3] In humans it was mapped to chromosome 11p15.1,[4][5] where it spans a 20kb genomic region, organized in 6 exons. The full length transcript is 0.8kb,[4][6] while a splice variant, originating from the alternative splicing of exons 3 and 4, was recently identified and designated MLP-b.[7]
Structure
MLP contains two LIM domains (LIM1 and LIM2), each being surrounded by glycine-rich regions, and the two separated by more than 50 residues.[8] LIM domains offer a remarkable ability for protein-protein interactions.[9] Furthermore, MLP carries a nuclear localization signal at amino acid positions 64-69 [10] MLP can be acetylated/deacetylated at the position 69 lysine residue (K69), by acetyltransferase (PCAF) and histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4), respectively.[11] In myocytes, MLP has the ability to oligomerize, forming dimers, trimers and tetramers, an attribute that impacts its interactions, localization and function.[12]
Protein interactions and localization
MLP has been identified to bind to an increasing list of proteins, exhibiting variable subcellular localization and diverse functional properties. In particular, MLP interacts with proteins at the:
M-line as well as plasma membrane localization of MLP has also been observed, however, the protein associations mediating this subcellular distribution are currently unknown.[12][21]
These diverse localization patterns and binding partners of MLP suggest a multitude of roles relating both to the striated myocyte cytoskeleton and the nucleus.[22] The role of MLP in each of these two cellular compartments appears to be dynamic, with studies demonstrating nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, driven by its nuclear localization signal, over time and under different conditions.[22]
Functions
In the nucleus, MLP acts as a positive regulator of myogenesis and promotes myogenic differentiation.[3] Overexpression of MLP enhances myotube differentiation, an effect attributed to the direct association of MLP with muscle specific transcription factors such as MyoD, myogenin and MRF4 and consequently the transcriptional control of fundamental muscle-specific genes.[3][7][20]
In the cytoplasm, MLP is an important scaffold protein, implicated in various cytoskeletal macromolecular complexes, at the sarcomeric Z-line, the costameres, and the microfilaments.[6][7][11][13][14][15][16] At the Z-line, MLP interacts with different Z-line components [6][7][11][13][14][15][16][23][24] and acts as a scaffold protein promoting the assembly of macromolecular complexes along sarcomeres and actin-based cytoskeleton [6][17][19][25][26] Moreover, since the Z-line acts as a stretch sensor,[27][28][29][30] MLP is believed to be involved in mechano-signaling processes. Indeed, cardiomyocytes from MLP transgenic or knock-out mouse exhibit defective intrinsic stretch responses, due to selective loss of passive stretch sensing.[6][21]
At the costameres, another region implicated in force transmission, MLP is thought to be contributing in mechanosensing through its interactions with β1 spectrin and zyxin. However, the precise role of MLP at the costameres has not been extensively investigated yet.
At the microfilaments, MLP is implicated in actin remodeling (or actin dynamics) through its interaction with cofilin-2 (CFL2). Binding of MLP to CFL2 enhances the CFL2-dependent F-actin depolymerization,[14] with a recent study demonstrating that MLP can act directly on actin cytoskeleton dynamics through direct binding that stabilizes and crosslinks actin filaments into bundles.[31]
Additionally, MLP is indirectly related to calcium homeostasis and energy metabolism. Specifically, acetylation of MLP increases the calcium sensitivity of myofilaments and regulates contractility,[11] while the absence of MLP causes alterations in calcium signaling (intracellular calcium handling) with defects in excitation-contraction coupling.[32][33][34] Furthermore, lack of MLP leads to local loss of mitochondria and energy deficiency.[35]
Clinical significance
MLP is directly associated with striated muscle diseases. Mutations in the CSRP3 gene have been detected in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) [e.g. G72R and K69R], and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) [e.g. L44P, S46R, S54R/E55G, C58G, R64C, Y66C, Q91L, K42/fs165], while the most frequent MLP mutation, W4R, has been found in both of these patient populations.[6][10][21][36][37][38][39] Biochemical and functional studies have been performed for some of these mutant proteins, and reveal aberrant localization and interaction patterns, leading to impaired molecular and cellular functions. For example, the W4R mutation abolishes the MLP/T-cap interaction, leading to mislocalization of T-cap, Z-line instability and severe sarcomeric structural defects.[6] The C58G mutation causes reduced protein stability due to enhanced ubiquitin-dependent proteasome degradation[36] while the K69L mutation, which is within the predicted nuclear localization signal of MLP, abolishes the MLP/α-actinin interaction and causes altered subcellular distribution of the mutant protein, showing predominant perinuclear localization.[39]
Alterations in the protein expression levels of MLP, its oligomerization or splicing have also been described in human cardiac and skeletal muscle diseases: both MLP protein levels and oligomerization are down-regulated in human heart failure,[12][15] while MLP levels are significantly changed in different skeletal myopathies, including facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, nemaline myopathy and limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B.[40][41][42] Moreover, significant changes in MLP-b protein expression levels, as well as deregulation of the MLP:MLP-b ratio have been detected in limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and dermatomyositis patients.[7]
Animal models
Animal models are providing valuable insight on MLP’s functional significance in striated muscle pathophysiology. Ablation of Mlp (MLP-/-) in mice affects all striated muscles, although the cardiac phenotype is more severe, leading to alterations in cardiac pressure and volume, aberrant contractility, development of dilated cardiomyopathy with hypertrophy and progressive heart failure.[26][32][43] At the histological level there is dramatic disruption of the cardiomyocyte cytoarchitecture at multiple levels, and pronounced fibrosis.[19][26][34][44] Other cellular changes included alterations in intracellular calcium handling, local loss of mitochondria and energy deficiency.[32][33][34]
Crossing MLP-/- mice with phospholamban (PLN) -/-, or β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) -/-, or angiotensin II type 1a receptor (AT1a) -/-, or β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 inhibitor (bARK1) -/- mice, as well as overexpressing calcineurin rescued their cardiac function, through a series of only partly understood molecular mechanisms.[45][46][47][48][49] Conversely crossing MLP-/- mice with β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR) -/- mice was lethal, while crossing MLP-/- mice with calcineurin -/- mice, enhanced fibrosis and cardiomyopathy.[45][46] A gene knockin mouse model harboring the human MLP-W4R mutation developed HCM and heart failure, while ultrastructural analysis of its cardiac tissue revealed myocardial disarray and significant fibrosis, increased nuclear localization of MLP concomitantly with reduced sarcomeric Z-line distribution.[21]
Alterations in MLP nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, which are possibly modulated by changes in its oligomerization status, have also been implicated in hypertrophy and heart failure, independently of mutations.[12][22]
Studies in Drosophila revealed that genetic ablation of Mlp84B, the Drosophila homolog of MLP, was associated with pupal lethality and impaired muscle function.[23] Mechanical studies of Mlp84B-null flight muscles indicate that loss of Mlp84B results in decreased muscle stiffness and power generation.[50] Cardiac-specific ablation of Mlp84B caused decreased lifespan, impaired diastolic function and disturbances in cardiac rhythm.[51]
Overall, these animal models have provided critical evidence on the functional significance of MLP in striated muscle physiology and pathophysiology.
References
↑Gehmlich K, Geier C, Milting H, Fürst D, Ehler E (2008). "Back to square one: what do we know about the functions of muscle LIM protein in the heart?". Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 29 (6–8): 155–8. doi:10.1007/s10974-008-9159-4. PMID19115046.
↑ 3.03.13.23.3Arber S, Halder G, Caroni P (Oct 1994). "Muscle LIM protein, a novel essential regulator of myogenesis, promotes myogenic differentiation". Cell. 79 (2): 221–31. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90192-9. PMID7954791.
↑ 4.04.1Fung YW, Wang R, Liew CC (Jun 1996). "Characterization of a human cardiac gene which encodes for a LIM domain protein and is developmentally expressed in myocardial development". Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 28 (6): 1203–10. doi:10.1006/jmcc.1996.0111. PMID8782062.
↑Fung YW, Wang RX, Heng HH, Liew CC (Aug 1995). "Mapping of a human LIM protein (CLP) to human chromosome 11p15.1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization". Genomics. 28 (3): 602–3. doi:10.1006/geno.1995.1200. PMID7490106.
↑ 6.06.16.26.36.46.56.66.7Knöll R, Hoshijima M, Hoffman HM, Person V, Lorenzen-Schmidt I, Bang ML, Hayashi T, Shiga N, Yasukawa H, Schaper W, McKenna W, Yokoyama M, Schork NJ, Omens JH, McCulloch AD, Kimura A, Gregorio CC, Poller W, Schaper J, Schultheiss HP, Chien KR (Dec 2002). "The cardiac mechanical stretch sensor machinery involves a Z disc complex that is defective in a subset of human dilated cardiomyopathy". Cell. 111 (7): 943–55. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01226-6. PMID12507422.
↑Weiskirchen R, Pino JD, Macalma T, Bister K, Beckerle MC (Dec 1995). "The cysteine-rich protein family of highly related LIM domain proteins". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 270 (48): 28946–54. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.48.28946. PMID7499425.
↑ 12.012.112.212.3Boateng SY, Belin RJ, Geenen DL, Margulies KB, Martin JL, Hoshijima M, de Tombe PP, Russell B (Jan 2007). "Cardiac dysfunction and heart failure are associated with abnormalities in the subcellular distribution and amounts of oligomeric muscle LIM protein". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 292 (1): H259–69. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00766.2006. PMID16963613.
↑ 13.013.113.213.3Louis HA, Pino JD, Schmeichel KL, Pomiès P, Beckerle MC (Oct 1997). "Comparison of three members of the cysteine-rich protein family reveals functional conservation and divergent patterns of gene expression". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 272 (43): 27484–91. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.43.27484. PMID9341203.
↑ 17.017.1Flick MJ, Konieczny SF (May 2000). "The muscle regulatory and structural protein MLP is a cytoskeletal binding partner of betaI-spectrin". Journal of Cell Science. 113 (9): 1553–64. PMID10751147.
↑Postel R, Vakeel P, Topczewski J, Knöll R, Bakkers J (Jun 2008). "Zebrafish integrin-linked kinase is required in skeletal muscles for strengthening the integrin-ECM adhesion complex". Developmental Biology. 318 (1): 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.024. PMID18436206.
↑ 23.023.1Clark KA, Bland JM, Beckerle MC (Jun 2007). "The Drosophila muscle LIM protein, Mlp84B, cooperates with D-titin to maintain muscle structural integrity". Journal of Cell Science. 120 (Pt 12): 2066–77. doi:10.1242/jcs.000695. PMID17535853.
↑Arber S, Caroni P (Feb 1996). "Specificity of single LIM motifs in targeting and LIM/LIM interactions in situ". Genes & Development. 10 (3): 289–300. doi:10.1101/gad.10.3.289. PMID8595880.
↑ 26.026.126.2Arber S, Hunter JJ, Ross J, Hongo M, Sansig G, Borg J, Perriard JC, Chien KR, Caroni P (Feb 1997). "MLP-deficient mice exhibit a disruption of cardiac cytoarchitectural organization, dilated cardiomyopathy, and heart failure". Cell. 88 (3): 393–403. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81878-4. PMID9039266.
↑Gautel M (Feb 2011). "The sarcomeric cytoskeleton: who picks up the strain?". Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 23 (1): 39–46. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2010.12.001. PMID21190822.
↑ 32.032.132.2Esposito G, Santana LF, Dilly K, Cruz JD, Mao L, Lederer WJ, Rockman HA (Dec 2000). "Cellular and functional defects in a mouse model of heart failure". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 279 (6): H3101–12. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.6.H3101. PMID11087268.
↑ 33.033.1Kemecsei P, Miklós Z, Bíró T, Marincsák R, Tóth BI, Komlódi-Pásztor E, Barnucz E, Mirk E, Van der Vusse GJ, Ligeti L, Ivanics T (Sep 2010). "Hearts of surviving MLP-KO mice show transient changes of intracellular calcium handling". Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 342 (1–2): 251–60. doi:10.1007/s11010-010-0492-8. PMID20490897.
↑ 34.034.134.2Su Z, Yao A, Zubair I, Sugishita K, Ritter M, Li F, Hunter JJ, Chien KR, Barry WH (Jun 2001). "Effects of deletion of muscle LIM protein on myocyte function". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 280 (6): H2665–73. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.6.H2665. PMID11356623.
↑van den Bosch BJ, van den Burg CM, Schoonderwoerd K, Lindsey PJ, Scholte HR, de Coo RF, van Rooij E, Rockman HA, Doevendans PA, Smeets HJ (Feb 2005). "Regional absence of mitochondria causing energy depletion in the myocardium of muscle LIM protein knockout mice". Cardiovascular Research. 65 (2): 411–8. doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.10.025. PMID15639480.
↑ 36.036.1Geier C, Gehmlich K, Ehler E, Hassfeld S, Perrot A, Hayess K, Cardim N, Wenzel K, Erdmann B, Krackhardt F, Posch MG, Osterziel KJ, Bublak A, Nägele H, Scheffold T, Dietz R, Chien KR, Spuler S, Fürst DO, Nürnberg P, Ozcelik C (Sep 2008). "Beyond the sarcomere: CSRP3 mutations cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy". Human Molecular Genetics. 17 (18): 2753–65. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn160. PMID18505755.
↑Geier C, Perrot A, Ozcelik C, Binner P, Counsell D, Hoffmann K, Pilz B, Martiniak Y, Gehmlich K, van der Ven PF, Fürst DO, Vornwald A, von Hodenberg E, Nürnberg P, Scheffold T, Dietz R, Osterziel KJ (Mar 2003). "Mutations in the human muscle LIM protein gene in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy". Circulation. 107 (10): 1390–5. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000056522.82563.5f. PMID12642359.
↑von der Hagen M, Laval SH, Cree LM, Haldane F, Pocock M, Wappler I, Peters H, Reitsamer HA, Hoger H, Wiedner M, Oberndorfer F, Anderson LV, Straub V, Bittner RE, Bushby KM (Dec 2005). "The differential gene expression profiles of proximal and distal muscle groups are altered in pre-pathological dysferlin-deficient mice". Neuromuscular Disorders. 15 (12): 863–77. doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2005.09.002. PMID16288871.
↑Winokur ST, Chen YW, Masny PS, Martin JH, Ehmsen JT, Tapscott SJ, van der Maarel SM, Hayashi Y, Flanigan KM (Nov 2003). "Expression profiling of FSHD muscle supports a defect in specific stages of myogenic differentiation". Human Molecular Genetics. 12 (22): 2895–907. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddg327. PMID14519683.
↑Omens JH, Usyk TP, Li Z, McCulloch AD (Feb 2002). "Muscle LIM protein deficiency leads to alterations in passive ventricular mechanics". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 282 (2): H680–7. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00773.2001. PMID11788418.
↑Minamisawa S, Hoshijima M, Chu G, Ward CA, Frank K, Gu Y, Martone ME, Wang Y, Ross J, Kranias EG, Giles WR, Chien KR (Oct 1999). "Chronic phospholamban-sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase interaction is the critical calcium cycling defect in dilated cardiomyopathy". Cell. 99 (3): 313–22. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81662-1. PMID10555147.
↑Yamamoto R, Akazawa H, Ito K, Toko H, Sano M, Yasuda N, Qin Y, Kudo Y, Sugaya T, Chien KR, Komuro I (Dec 2007). "Angiotensin II type 1a receptor signals are involved in the progression of heart failure in MLP-deficient mice". Circulation Journal. 71 (12): 1958–64. doi:10.1253/circj.71.1958. PMID18037754.
↑Mery A, Taghli-Lamallem O, Clark KA, Beckerle MC, Wu X, Ocorr K, Bodmer R (Jan 2008). "The Drosophila muscle LIM protein, Mlp84B, is essential for cardiac function". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 211 (Pt 1): 15–23. doi:10.1242/jeb.012435. PMID18083727.