Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diphyllobothriasis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Diphyllobothriasis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

CT Scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective

CDC on Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective

Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Diphyllobothriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Diphyllobothriasis historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Furqan M M. M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

Eggs of Diphyllobothrium are found in France and Germany dates back to 4000 BC. In 1592 AD, T. Dunus gave the first recognizable description of the disease and the life cycle was fully elucidated at the end of 19th century.

Historical Perspective

Eggs of Diphyllobothrium found in France and Germany dates back to 4000 BC. In 1592 AD, T. Dunus made the first recognizable description of the disease in Locarno, Switzerland.[1][2]

History of the lifecycle of diphyllobothrium latum:

  • In 1747 AD, H. D. Sporing recognized the link between the parasite and fish.
  • 1758 AD, C. Linnaeus gave the name Taenia to the species.
  • At the end of the 19th-century, transmission to humans through consumption of infected fish was elucidated.
  • In 1917, Janicki and Rosen identified the role of the copepod as the first intermediate host.

References

  1. Scholz T, Garcia HH, Kuchta R, Wicht B (2009). "Update on the human broad tapeworm (genus diphyllobothrium), including clinical relevance". Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 22 (1): 146–60, Table of Contents. doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-08. PMC 2620636. PMID 19136438.
  2. Guttowa A, Moskwa B (2005). "[The history of the exploration of the Diphyllobothrium latum life cycle]". Wiad Parazytol (in Polish). 51 (4): 359–64. PMID 16913511.

Template:WH Template:WS