NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chest pain Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Chest pain from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Chest Pain in Pregnancy

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain

CDC on NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain

NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain in the news

Blogs on NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain

to Hospitals Treating NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain

Risk calculators and risk factors for NICE guidelines for the management of patients with acute chest pain

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2] Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [4]

Overview

In the 2016 update of the stable chest pain guideline, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has dramatically changed its approach to new-onset stable chest pain aiming to find a more cost-effective strategy including NO use of pretest probability risk scores or NO use of functional tests, such as stress echocardiography, as a first-line investigation. The suggestion is to use CT coronary angiography in [[patients] with typical or atypical chest pain. In addition, there is no recommendation for any diagnostic testing if chest pain is non-anginal. Also, perfusion imaging is offered in the setting of uncertainty about the functional significance of coronary lesions. However, the recommendation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC—2013) is functional tests as the initial investigation.

NICE Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Chest Pain [1]

  • If the patient is currently pain-free, but had chest pain in the last 12 hours, and resting 12-lead ECG is abnormal or not available or develops further chest pain after recent (confirmed or suspected) ACS, evaluation about ACS is warranted.
  • Management of ACS:
  • Assessment of patients with suspected ACS in the hospital:

· Repeated resting 12-lead ECGs · Checking pain relief

  • Use of high-sensitivity troponin tests is not recommended, if ACS is not suspected
  • For patients at high or moderate risk of MI (as indicated by a validated tool), performing high sensitivity troponin tests is reasonable.
  • For patients at low risk of MI :
  • Performing a second high-sensitivity troponin test
  • Considering a single high-sensitivity troponin test only at presentation to rule out NSTEMI , if the first troponin test is below the lower limit of detection (negative).
  • A detectable troponin on the first high-sensitivity test does not necessary for patients with confirmed MI.
  • For diagnose of ACS use of biochemical markers such as natriuretic peptides and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are not recommended.

.

  • Factors should be considered for interpreting high-sensitivity troponin:
  • the clinical presentation
  • The time from onset of symptoms
  • The resting 12-lead ECG findings
  • The pre-test probability of NSTEMI
  • The length of time since the suspected ACS
  • The probability of chronically elevated troponin levels in some patients
  • That 99th percentile threshold for troponin I and T may differ between sexes.

References

  1. Carrabba N, Migliorini A, Pradella S, Acquafresca M, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Moscogiuri G, Valenti R (2018). "Old and New NICE Guidelines for the Evaluation of New Onset Stable Chest Pain: A Real World Perspective". Biomed Res Int. 2018: 3762305. doi:10.1155/2018/3762305. PMC 6250018. PMID 30533431.


Template:WikiDoc Sources