Cerebral palsy screening: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aditya Ganti (talk | contribs) |
Aditya Ganti (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Cerebral palsy}} | {{Cerebral palsy}} | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} | {{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{ADG}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity. | There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Screening== | ==Screening== | ||
*There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. | *There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. | ||
*Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity.<ref name="pmid27458551">{{cite journal |vauthors=Upasani VV, Ketwaroo PD, Estroff JA, Warf BC, Emans JB, Glotzbecker MP |title=Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of congenital spinal anomalies: Review for prenatal counseling |journal=World J Orthop |volume=7 |issue=7 |pages=406–17 |year=2016 |pmid=27458551 |pmc=4945507 |doi=10.5312/wjo.v7.i7.406 |url=}}</ref> | *Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in [[developmental milestones]] or development of [[spasticity]].<ref name="pmid27458551">{{cite journal |vauthors=Upasani VV, Ketwaroo PD, Estroff JA, Warf BC, Emans JB, Glotzbecker MP |title=Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of congenital spinal anomalies: Review for prenatal counseling |journal=World J Orthop |volume=7 |issue=7 |pages=406–17 |year=2016 |pmid=27458551 |pmc=4945507 |doi=10.5312/wjo.v7.i7.406 |url=}}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 6 October 2017
|
Cerebral palsy Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Cerebral palsy screening On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cerebral palsy screening |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Cerebral palsy screening |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]
Overview
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy. Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity.
Screening
- There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for cerebral palsy.
- Serial follow-up exams of all newborns from neonatal intensive care are warranted until it is evident that there is no failure in developmental milestones or development of spasticity.[1]
References
- ↑ Upasani VV, Ketwaroo PD, Estroff JA, Warf BC, Emans JB, Glotzbecker MP (2016). "Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of congenital spinal anomalies: Review for prenatal counseling". World J Orthop. 7 (7): 406–17. doi:10.5312/wjo.v7.i7.406. PMC 4945507. PMID 27458551.