Liposarcoma overview: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suveenkrishna Pothuru (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Suveenkrishna Pothuru (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
===Laboratory Findings===
===Laboratory Findings===
There are no specific laboratory tests for the diagnosis of liposarcoma. The pertinent laboratory findings of liposarcoma include [[anemia]] and [[BUN|elevated BUN]] due to GI bleeding and elevated [[creatinine]] among patients with [[obstructive nephropathy]].
There are no specific laboratory tests for the diagnosis of liposarcoma. The pertinent laboratory findings of liposarcoma include [[anemia]] and [[BUN|elevated BUN]] due to GI bleeding and elevated [[creatinine]] among patients with [[obstructive nephropathy]].
===Biopsy===
The definitive diagnosis of liposarcoma is made by biopsy, which also provides histopathological classification of the liposarcoma's subtype.
===CT===
CT imaging is crucial for the diagnosis of liposarcoma. CT scan may detect regions of lipid and non-lipid components that correlate with histological subtypes of liposarcoma. CT imaging may demonstrate the size, location, and depth of a liposarcoma, as well as [[lymph node]] involvement and distant [[metastasis]]. CT findings may be correlated with the [[histopathological]] subtype.
===MRI===
MRI is the optimal imaging test for the diagnosis of liposarcoma.  MRI findings for a well-differentiated liposarcoma include a mass with at least 75% of [[adipose]] content with thin irregular [[septa]].  MRI also evaluates the size, location, and depth of the mass.  MRI findings help to differentiate between the different subtypes of liposarcoma and help to assess distant [[metastasis]].





Revision as of 15:10, 26 August 2015

Liposarcoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Liposarcoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Liposarcoma overview On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Liposarcoma overview

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Liposarcoma overview

CDC on Liposarcoma overview

Liposarcoma overview in the news

Blogs on Liposarcoma overview

Directions to Hospitals Treating Liposarcoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Liposarcoma overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Alejandro Lemor, M.D. [2]; Ammu Susheela, M.D. [3]

Overview

Liposarcoma is a uncommon cancer of connective tissues. Liposarcoma is a malignant tumor that arises in fat cells in deep soft tissue, such as that inside the thigh or in the retroperitoneum.

They are typically large bulky tumors which tend to have multiple smaller satellites extending beyond the main confines of the tumor.

Historical Perspective

Liposarcoma was first described by Dr. Rudolph Virchow, a German pathologist, in 1857. Virchow reported a "myxoma lipomatoides malignum", highlighting the malignant nature of the tumor. Between 1954 and 1979, several authors reported cases of liposarcoma and suggested that liposarcoma should be classified according to histopathological analysis into well-differentiated, myxoid, and dedifferentiated subtypes.

Classification

Liposarcoma may be classified into well-differentiated, de-differentiated, myxoid, round cell, or pleomorphic liposarcoma.

Pathophysiology

The pathogenesis of liposarcoma depends on the histological subtype. The role of proto-oncogenes has been implicated in the development of well-differentiated liposarcoma

Causes

There are no established causes for liposarcoma.

Differential Diagnosis

Liposarcoma must be differentiated from other diseases that cause a painless, growing mass such as spindle cell lipoma, neurofibroma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Liposarcoma is the second most common type of all soft tissue sarcomas in adults. The annual incidence is 0.25 cases per 100,000 individuals. Men are slightly more affected with liposarcoma than women. It is most frequent in middle-aged and older adults.

Risk Factors

Common risk factors in the development of liposarcoma include chemical carcinogens, radiation, immunodeficiency, genetic disorders, and viral infections.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Common complication of liposarcoma include metastasis. Mass may compress adjacent structures causing different clinical manifestations. Metastasis is the most important aspect to assess in the prognosis of liposarcoma. The prognosis will depend on the histopathological subtype, being the well differentiated liposarcoma the subtype with the best prognosis, and the pleomorphic liposarcoma with the worst prognosis.

Diagnosis

Staging

The staging of liposarcoma is based on the TNM classification, which includes primary tumor spread, lymph node involvement, and presence of metastasis.

History and Symptoms

Liposarcoma usually presents as a painless mass. The most common location of a liposarcoma is the lower extremities. Patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma remain asymptomatic until the mass invades adjacent structures, which may cause pain or obstructive symptoms.

Physical Examination

Physical examination findings of liposarcoma depend on the location of the tumor. Since most liposarcomas are located in the lower extremities, liposarcoma is commonly associated with the findings of palpable firm nontender mass in one lower extremity. Physical examination of retroperitoneal liposarcomas is usually unremarkable, but other pertinent findings on physical examination of retroperitoneal liposarcomas include palpation of an abdominal mass, abdominal distension, and tenderness.

Laboratory Findings

There are no specific laboratory tests for the diagnosis of liposarcoma. The pertinent laboratory findings of liposarcoma include anemia and elevated BUN due to GI bleeding and elevated creatinine among patients with obstructive nephropathy.

Biopsy

The definitive diagnosis of liposarcoma is made by biopsy, which also provides histopathological classification of the liposarcoma's subtype.

CT

CT imaging is crucial for the diagnosis of liposarcoma. CT scan may detect regions of lipid and non-lipid components that correlate with histological subtypes of liposarcoma. CT imaging may demonstrate the size, location, and depth of a liposarcoma, as well as lymph node involvement and distant metastasis. CT findings may be correlated with the histopathological subtype.

MRI

MRI is the optimal imaging test for the diagnosis of liposarcoma. MRI findings for a well-differentiated liposarcoma include a mass with at least 75% of adipose content with thin irregular septa. MRI also evaluates the size, location, and depth of the mass. MRI findings help to differentiate between the different subtypes of liposarcoma and help to assess distant metastasis.


References


Template:WikiDoc Sources