Androgen insensitivity syndrome surgery: Difference between revisions
Irfan Dotani (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Androgen insensitivity syndrome}} | {{Androgen insensitivity syndrome}} | ||
{{CMG}}: {{AE}} | |||
{{CMG}} | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
There is also the issue of whether medical advances might enable tissue from testes in situ to be used with a donor egg to produce a child via IVF that is genetically related to the XY woman. This chance is lost for ever if the testes have been removed, unless they are preserved in some way. Apart from this, a significant number of CAIS women say that they never felt the same after gonadectomy as a young adult, that they lose their libido etc. Another benefit provided by testes in CAIS is the estradiol produced from testosterone. Although this can be provided pharmaceutically post-gonadectomy, many CAIS women have trouble adjusting to artificial HRT and regret losing their natural source of oestrogen. | There is also the issue of whether medical advances might enable tissue from testes in situ to be used with a donor egg to produce a child via IVF that is genetically related to the XY woman. This chance is lost for ever if the testes have been removed, unless they are preserved in some way. Apart from this, a significant number of CAIS women say that they never felt the same after gonadectomy as a young adult, that they lose their libido etc. Another benefit provided by testes in CAIS is the estradiol produced from testosterone. Although this can be provided pharmaceutically post-gonadectomy, many CAIS women have trouble adjusting to artificial HRT and regret losing their natural source of oestrogen. | ||
===2. Incomplete or partial AIS=== | ===2. Incomplete or partial AIS=== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:Endocrinology]] | [[Category:Endocrinology]] | ||
{{WH}} | {{WH}} | ||
{{WS}} | {{WS}} | ||
Revision as of 18:09, 22 July 2016
|
Androgen insensitivity syndrome Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Androgen insensitivity syndrome from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Androgen insensitivity syndrome surgery On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Androgen insensitivity syndrome surgery |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Androgen insensitivity syndrome |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Androgen insensitivity syndrome surgery |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]: Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:
Overview
Surgery
1. Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
Vaginal enlargement For women for whom vaginal shallowness is a problem, enlargement can be achieved by a prolonged course of self-dilation. Surgical construction of a vagina is sometimes performed for adults but carries its own potential problems.
Gonadectomy decision Optimal timing of removal of the testes has been the management issue most often debated by physicians, though whether it is necessary has been questioned as well. The advantage of retaining the (usually intra-abdominal) testes until after puberty is that pubertal changes will happen "naturally," without hormone replacement. This happens because the testosterone produced by the testes gets converted to oestrogen in the body tissues (a process known as aromatisation).
The primary argument for removal is that testes remaining in the abdomen throughout life may develop benign or malignant tumors and confer little benefit. The testicular cancer risk in CAIS appears to be higher than that which occurs with men whose testes have remained in the abdomen, and rare cases of testicular cancer occurring in adolescents with CAIS have been reported. Unfortunately the uncommonness of CAIS and the small numbers of women who have not had testes removed make cancer risk difficult to quantify. The best evidence suggests that women with CAIS and PAIS retaining their testes after puberty have a 25% chance of developing benign (harmless) tumors and a 4-9% chance of malignancy.
There is also the issue of whether medical advances might enable tissue from testes in situ to be used with a donor egg to produce a child via IVF that is genetically related to the XY woman. This chance is lost for ever if the testes have been removed, unless they are preserved in some way. Apart from this, a significant number of CAIS women say that they never felt the same after gonadectomy as a young adult, that they lose their libido etc. Another benefit provided by testes in CAIS is the estradiol produced from testosterone. Although this can be provided pharmaceutically post-gonadectomy, many CAIS women have trouble adjusting to artificial HRT and regret losing their natural source of oestrogen.
2. Incomplete or partial AIS
Management issues for PAIS are virtually the same as for CAIS. Most women with PAIS do not seek genital reconstructive surgery for anatomic differences.
3. Reifenstein syndrome
The first major management decision is the sex of assignment: will the baby be a boy or girl? Assignment depends partly on predicting likely pubertal development, potential response of the phallus to testosterone, and likely outcome of surgical reconstruction attempts. The Reifenstein form of AIS can present one of the most challenging sets of decisions imaginable as parents and physicians try to choose the "least bad" of several undesirable options.
- Male assignment is usually followed by one or more operations in infancy by a pediatric urologist to completely repair the hypospadias, close the midline pouch, and (if possible) place the testes in the scrotum. Gonadal status and potential testosterone responsiveness is reassessed around age 12. Breast tissue can be removed surgically in adolescence if excessive. Gonads should be removed if scrotal placement is impossible. High dose testosterone replacement will sometimes achieve further virilization. An advantage of this choice commonly cited by parents is consistency with karyotype. A survey of adults brought up this way reported that nearly all were comfortable with the gender assignment made at birth and the sexual function of their genitalia, but many were dissatisfied with the size.
- Female assignment is usually followed by gonadectomy in childhood to prevent further masculinization, especially at puberty; sometimes by surgery to enlarge the vaginal opening and reduce clitoral size. Estrogen is replaced at puberty. This course has the advantage that future tissue sensitivity to testosterone is irrelevant for a girl. This course may involve fewer surgical procedures than male assignment and surgery, and may produce a better cosmetic outcome, but a higher percentage of women raised with early surgical repair describe impairment of sexual sensation or function.
- A third option has been advocated in the last decade by some: to tentatively assign male or female sex but postpone all surgery until early adolescence. This approach is intended to make it easier for an adolescent to reject or confirm the gender assigned in infancy by parents and doctors, and to choose or refuse reconstructive surgery. This approach might reduce the frequency of double surgery or unsatisfactory surgical outcomes, and would not jeopardize erectile tissue. Potential disadvantages of this course would be the psychosocial challenges to child and parents of the anatomic differentness, the potential adverse effect on adolescent social development of unresolved sexual identity issues combined with a 1" phallus and large breasts, and perhaps the unfairness of presenting a child in early adolescence with choices deferred as too difficult by parents and physicians 12 years earlier. The greatest appeal of this choice may be that we don't yet know the magnitude or frequency of the potential problems as well as we do for the more traditional choices.
- More radical suggestions such as attempting to avoid assigning a sex at all, or teaching the child to identify __self as a third sex have not found much acceptance among those who are actually raising and caring for children, or among many intersex advocates.
Over the last 40-50 years, the second path, female assignment with reconstructive surgery in infancy, has been the course most often chosen by parents and physicians, and the hazards of this course are most familiar. Since 1997, male assignment with early surgery is increasing in popularity, and even the third course of delaying surgery is sometimes followed. Advantages and disadvantages of this course will become apparent over the next two decades.