Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access

Revision as of 18:43, 18 October 2012 by Shankar Kumar (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidelines Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

PCI Approaches:

CAD Revascularization:

Heart Team Approach to Revascularization Decisions
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
Intervention in left main coronary artery disease
Non-Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
Revascularization to Improve Symptoms
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Compliance and Stent Thrombosis
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Pre-procedural Considerations:

Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury
Anaphylactoid Reactions
Statin Treatment
Bleeding Risk
Role of Onsite Surgical Backup

Procedural Considerations:

Vascular Access
PCI in Specific Clinical Situations:
Asymptomatic Ischemia or CCS Class I or II Angina
CCS Class III Angina
Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction:
General and Specific Considerations
Coronary Angiography Strategies in STEMI
Primary PCI of the Infarct Artery
Delayed or Elective PCI in patients with STEMI
Fibrinolytic-Ineligible Patients
Facilitated PCI
Rescue PCI
After Successful Fibrinolysis or for Patients Not Undergoing Primary Reperfusion
Cardiogenic Shock
Prior Coronary Bypass Surgery
Revascularization Before Non-cardiac Surgery
Adjunctive Diagnostic Devices:
Fractional Flow Reserve
Intravascular Ultrasound
Adjunctive Therapeutic Devices:
Coronary Atherectomy
Thrombectomy
Laser Angioplasty
Cutting Balloon Angioplasty
Embolic Protection Devices
Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support Devices
Antiplatelet therapy:
Oral Antiplatelet Therapy
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonists
Intravenous Antiplatelet therapy:
STEMI
UA/NSTEMI
SIHD
Anticoagulant Therapy:
Parenteral Anticoagulants During PCI
Unfractionated Heparin
Enoxaparin
Bivalirudin and Argatroban
Fondaparinux
No-Reflow Pharmacological Therapies
PCI in Specific Anatomic Situations:
Chronic Total Occlusions
Saphenous Vein Grafts
Bifurcation Lesions
Aorto-Ostial Stenoses
Calcified Lesions
PCI in Specific Patient Populations:
Chronic Kidney Disease
Peri-procedural Myocardial Infarction Assessment
Vascular Closure Devices

Post-Procedural Considerations:

Post-procedural Antiplatelet Therapy
Proton Pump Inhibitors and Antiplatelet Therapy
Clopidogrel Genetic Testing
Platelet Function Testing
Restenosis
Exercise Testing
Cardiac Rehabilitation

Quality and Performance Considerations:

Quality and Performance
Certification and Maintenance of Certification
Operator and Institutional Competency and Volume

Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access

CDC on Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access

Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access in the news

Blogs on Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access

Directions to Hospitals Treating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Risk calculators and risk factors for Percutaneous coronary intervention vascular access

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [4]

ACCF/AHA 2011 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Vascular Access[1] (DO NOT EDIT)

Class IIa

"1. The use of radial artery access can be useful to decrease access site complications.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] (Level of Evidence: A)"

References

  1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH (2011). "2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions" (PDF). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 58 (24): 2550–83. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.006. PMID 22070837. Retrieved 2011-12-08. Text "PDF" ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Höltgen R, Tillmanns H (2009) A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2 (11):1047-54. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.016 PMID:19926042
  3. Jaffe R, Hong T, Sharieff W, Chisholm RJ, Kutryk MJ, Charron T et al. (2007)Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69 (6):815-20.DOI:10.1002/ccd.21021 PMID: [1]
  4. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR (2009)Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157 (1):132-40.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023 PMID:19081409
  5. Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, Hildick-Smith D, Loubeyre C, Rigattieri S et al. (2004)Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Am J Cardiol 94 (9):1177-80. [2] PMID: 15518616
  6. Pristipino C, Trani C, Nazzaro MS, Berni A, Patti G, Patrizi R et al. (2009)Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart 95 (6):476-82. DOI:10.1136/hrt.2008.150714 PMID:19036757
  7. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS et al. (2008) Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1 (4):379-86.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007 PMID:19463333
  8. Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC (2010) The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 55 (20):2187-95. [3] PMID: 20466199
  9. Hamon M, Rasmussen LH, Manoukian SV, Cequier A, Lincoff MA, Rupprecht HJ et al. (2009) Choice of arterial access site and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy: the ACUITY trial.EuroIntervention 5 (1):115-20. PMID: 19577992
  10. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P et al. (2011)Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377 (9775):1409-20.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2 PMID:21470671

Template:WH Template:WS