Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidelines Microchapters |
PCI Approaches: |
---|
CAD Revascularization: |
Pre-procedural Considerations: |
Procedural Considerations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Procedural Considerations: |
Quality and Performance Considerations: |
Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound |
FDA on Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound |
CDC on Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound |
Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound in the news |
Blogs on Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Percutaneous coronary intervention intravascular ultrasound |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention:Intravascular Ultrasound[1] (DO NOT EDIT)
Class I |
"'1.Before implantation of DES, the interventional cardiologist should discuss with the patient the need for and duration of DAPT and the ability of the patient to comply with and tolerate DAPT. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"'2.DES are useful as an alternative to BMS to reduce the risk of restenosis in cases in which the risk of restenosis is increased and the patient is likely to be able to tolerate and comply with prolonged DAPT (Level of Evidence: A for elective PCI233–237;(Level of Evidence: A) " for UA/NSTEMI; (Level of Evidence: A) " for STEMI. |
"'3.Balloon angioplasty or BMS should be used in patients with high bleeding risk, inability to comply with 12 months of DAPT, or anticipated invasive or surgical procedures within the next 12 months, during which time DAPT may be interrupted.(Level of Evidence: B) " |
Class III (HARM) |
"1.PCI with coronary stenting should not be performed if the patient is not likely to be able to tolerate and comply with DAPT.(Level of Evidence: B) " |
"2.DES should not be implanted if the patient is not likely to be able to tolerate and comply with prolonged DAPT or this cannot be determined before stent implantation.(Level of Evidence: B) " |
2005 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Intravascular Ultrasound[2](DO NOT EDIT)
Class III (No Benefit) |
"1. IVUS for routine lesion assessment is not recommended when revascularization with PCI or CABG is not being contemplated. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class IIa |
"1. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is reasonable for the assessment of angiographically indeterminant left main CAD.[3][4][5] (Level of Evidence: B)" |
"2. IVUS and coronary angiography are reasonable 4 to 6 weeks and 1 year after cardiac transplantation to exclude donor CAD, detect rapidly progressive cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and provide prognostic information.[6][7][8] (Level of Evidence: B)" |
"3. IVUS is reasonable to determine the mechanism of stent restenosis. [9] (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class IIb |
"1. IVUS may be reasonable for the assessment of non–left main coronary arteries with angiographically intermediate coronary stenoses (50% to 70% diameter stenosis).[3][10][11] (Level of Evidence: B)" |
"2. IVUS may be considered for guidance of coronary stent implantation, particularly in cases of left main coronary artery stenting.[4][9][12] (Level of Evidence: B)" |
"3. IVUS may be reasonable to determine the mechanism of stent thrombosis.[9] (Level of Evidence: C)" |
References
- ↑ Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH (2011). "2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions" (PDF). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 58 (24): 2550–83. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.006. PMID 22070837. Retrieved 2011-12-08. Text "PDF" ignored (help); Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Smith SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB; et al. (2006). "ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)". Circulation. 113 (7): e166–286. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.173220. PMID 16490830.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, Gimelli G, Nishida T, Adamian M, Corvaja N, Di Mario C, Colombo A (2001). "Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve". The American Journal of Cardiology. 87 (2): 136–41. PMID 11152827. Retrieved 2011-12-09. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ 4.0 4.1 Fassa AA, Wagatsuma K, Higano ST, Mathew V, Barsness GW, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR, Lerman A (2005). "Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 45 (2): 204–11. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.066. PMID 15653016. Retrieved 2011-12-09. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ (2011). "Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity". Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions. 4 (1): 65–71. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.959148. PMID 21266708. Retrieved 2011-12-09. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, Anderson A, Chan M, Desai S, Fedson S, Fisher P, Gonzales-Stawinski G, Martinelli L, McGiffin D, Smith J, Taylor D, Meiser B, Webber S, Baran D, Carboni M, Dengler T, Feldman D, Frigerio M, Kfoury A, Kim D, Kobashigawa J, Shullo M, Stehlik J, Teuteberg J, Uber P, Zuckermann A, Hunt S, Burch M, Bhat G, Canter C, Chinnock R, Crespo-Leiro M, Delgado R, Dobbels F, Grady K, Kao W, Lamour J, Parry G, Patel J, Pini D, Towbin J, Wolfel G, Delgado D, Eisen H, Goldberg L, Hosenpud J, Johnson M, Keogh A, Lewis C, O'Connell J, Rogers J, Ross H, Russell S, Vanhaecke J (2010). "The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients". The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation : the Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 29 (8): 914–56. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.034. PMID 20643330. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Kobashigawa JA, Tobis JM, Starling RC, Tuzcu EM, Smith AL, Valantine HA, Yeung AC, Mehra MR, Anzai H, Oeser BT, Abeywickrama KH, Murphy J, Cretin N (2005). "Multicenter intravascular ultrasound validation study among heart transplant recipients: outcomes after five years". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 45 (9): 1532–7. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.035. PMID 15862430. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Kapadia SR, Nissen SE, Ziada KM, Guetta V, Crowe TD, Hobbs RE, Starling RC, Young JB, Tuzcu EM (1998). "Development of transplantation vasculopathy and progression of donor-transmitted atherosclerosis: comparison by serial intravascular ultrasound imaging". Circulation. 98 (24): 2672–8. PMID 9851952. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, Mehran R (2010). "In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 56 (23): 1897–907. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.028. PMID 21109112. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H (1999). "Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve". Circulation. 100 (3): 250–5. PMID 10411848. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Magni V, Chieffo A, Colombo A (2009). "Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: Its use and abuse". Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 73 (4): 441–8. doi:10.1002/ccd.21812. PMID 19133668. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim WJ, Suh J, Yun SC, Lee CW, Hong MK, Lee JH, Park SW (2009). "Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis". Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2 (3): 167–77. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.799494. PMID 20031713. Retrieved 2011-12-10. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)