Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice

	Chronic renal failure Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Chronic renal failure from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Study of Choice
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
X Ray
CT
MRI
Echocardiography or Ultrasound
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice
CDC on Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice
Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice in the news
Blogs on Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice
Directions to Hospitals Treating Chronic renal failure
Risk calculators and risk factors for Chronic renal failure diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

[Name of the investigation] is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of [disease name].
The following result of [gold standard test] is confirmatory of [disease name]:
- Result 1
- Result 2
The [name of the investigation] should be performed when:
- The patient presented with symptoms/signs 1. 2, 3.
- A positive [test] is detected in the patient.
[Name of the investigation] is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of [disease name].
The diagnostic study of choice for [disease name] is [name of the investigation].
There is no single diagnostic study of choice for the diagnosis of [disease name].
There is no single diagnostic study of choice for the diagnosis of [disease name], but [disease name] can be diagnosed based on [name of the investigation 1] and [name of the investigation 2].
[Disease name] is mainly diagnosed based on clinical presentation.
Investigations:
- Among patients who present with clinical signs of [disease name], the [investigation name] is the most specific test for the diagnosis.
- Among patients who present with clinical signs of [disease name], the [investigation name] is the most sensitive test for diagnosis.
- Among patients who present with clinical signs of [disease name], the [investigation name] is the most efficient test for diagnosis.

Test	Sensitivity	Specificity
Test 1	✔	...%
Test 2	...%	✔

✔= The best test based on the feature

The following result of [investigation name] is confirmatory of [disease name]:

The [name of investigation] should be performed when:

The patient presented with symptoms/signs 1, 2, and 3 as the first step of diagnosis.
A positive [test] is detected in the patient, to confirm the diagnosis.

Here you should describe the details of the diagnostic criteria.
Always mention the name of the criteria/definition you are about to list (e.g. modified Duke criteria for the diagnosis of endocarditis / 3rd universal definition of MI) and cite the primary source of where this criteria/definition is found.
Although not necessary, it is recommended that you include the criteria in a table. Make sure you always cite the source of the content and whether the table has been adapted from another source.
Be very clear as to the number of criteria (or threshold) that needs to be met out of the total number of criteria.
Distinguish criteria based on their nature (e.g. clinical criteria / pathological criteria/ imaging criteria) before discussing them in details.
To view an example (endocarditis diagnostic criteria), click here
If relevant, add additional information that might help the reader distinguish various criteria or the evolution of criteria (e.g. original criteria vs. modified criteria).
You may also add information about the sensitivity and specificity of the criteria, the pre-test probability, and other figures that may help the reader understand how valuable the criteria are clinically.
[Disease name] is mainly diagnosed based on clinical presentation. There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].
There is no single diagnostic study of choice for [disease name], though [disease name] may be diagnosed based on [name of criteria] established by [...].

The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met: [criterion 1], [criterion 2], [criterion 3], and [criterion 4].
The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [criteria name] criteria, which includes [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].

[Disease name] may be diagnosed at any time if one or more of the following criteria are met:
- Criteria 1
- Criteria 2
- Criteria 3

IF there are clear, established diagnostic criteria:

The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met: [criterion 1], [criterion 2], [criterion 3], and [criterion 4].
The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [criteria name] criteria, which include [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].
The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [definition name] definition, which includes [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].

IF there are no established diagnostic criteria: