Lung mass screening
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lung Mass Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Lung mass screening On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Lung mass screening |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]
Overview
According to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), screening for suspected lung cancer by low-dose computed tomography is recommended every year among smokers who are between 55 to 80 years old and who have a history of 30 pack-years or more and either continue to smoke or have quit within the past 15 years (grade B recommendation).
Screening
Guidelines
- According to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), screening for suspected lung cancer by low-dose computed tomography is recommended every year among smokers who are between 55 to 80 years old and who have a history of 30 pack-years or more and either continue to smoke or have quit within the past 15 years (grade B recommendation).[1][2][3]
- According to the clinical practice guideline issued by the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) in 2013, screening for suspected lung cancer by low-dose CT (LDCT) is recommended every year among smokers and former smokers who are 55 to 74 years old and who have 30 pack-years history or more and either continue to smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.[4]
Strategies
- Low-dose helical computed tomography[5]
- Benefits:
- There is evidence that screening people aged 55 to 74 years who have a history of 30 or more pack-years and who, if they are former smokers, have quit within the last 15 years, reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% and all-cause mortality by 6.7%.
- Harms:
- The majority of of all positive low-dose helical computed tomography screening exams do not result in a lung cancer diagnosis.
- False-positive results may lead to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.
- Benefits:
- Screening with chest x-ray does not reduce mortality from lung cancer in the general population or in ever-smokers.
- Harms:
- False positive results.
- The majority of of all positive chest x-ray screening exams do not result in a lung cancer diagnosis.
- False-positive results may lead to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.
Overdiagnosis
- Based on current evidence, the majority of lung mass cases detected by screening chest x-ray appear to represent over-diagnosed cancer.[6]
- The magnitude of overdiagnosis appears to be between 5% and 25%.
- These cancers result in unnecessary diagnostic procedures and also lead to unnecessary treatment.
- Harms of diagnostic procedures and treatment occur most frequently among long-term and/or heavy smokers because of smoking-associated comorbidities that increase the risk.
References
- ↑ Davis AM, Cifu AS. Lung Cancer Screening. JAMA. 2014;312(12):1248-1249. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.12272.
- ↑ Recommendations. US preventive services task force(2016) http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Search?s=solitary_pulmonary_nodule Accessed on March, 15th 2016
- ↑ McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et. al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):910-9. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214726.
- ↑ Detterbeck FC, Mazzone PJ, Naidich DP, Bach PB (2013). "Screening for Lung Cancer: Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines". Chest. 143 (5 Suppl): e78S–92S. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2350. PMID 23649455. Summary in JournalWatch
- ↑ Lung Cancer Screening. National Cancer Institute 2015. http://www.cancer.gov/types/lung/hp/lung-screening-pdq Accessed on December 20, 2015
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Davis AM, Cifu AS. Lung Cancer Screening. JAMA. 2014;312(12):1248-1249. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.12272.