Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{MMJ}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{MMJ}}
== Overview ==
== Overview ==
*Three-dimensional ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for characterisation of the open spina bifida spinal lesions.<ref name="pmid24373566">{{cite journal |vauthors=Trudell AS, Odibo AO |title=Diagnosis of spina bifida on ultrasound: always termination? |journal=Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=367–77 |date=April 2014 |pmid=24373566 |doi=10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.10.006 |url=}}</ref>
Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for characterisation of the open spina bifida spinal lesions. On two and tree-dimensional ultrasound, spina bifida is characterized by: [[Vertebral anomalies|Vertebral defect]], splayed [[Vertebral|vertebral pedicles]] and disrupted [[vertebrae]]. The [[ultrasound]] must be performed when a positive [[alpha-fetoprotein]] is detected in the triple screening test between the 15th and 20th week of pregnancy to confirm the diagnosis.
*On Three-dimensional ultrasound, spina bifida is characterized by:<ref name="pmid12054297">{{cite journal |vauthors=Lee W, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Williams R, McNie B, Johnson A, Treadwell M, Comstock CH |title=A diagnostic approach for the evaluation of spina bifida by three-dimensional ultrasonography |journal=J Ultrasound Med |volume=21 |issue=6 |pages=619–26 |date=June 2002 |pmid=12054297 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
**[[Vertebral anomalies|Vertebral defect]]
**Splayed [[Vertebral|vertebral pedicles]]
**Disrupted [[vertebrae]]


== Diagnostic Study of Choice ==
== Diagnostic Study of Choice ==


=== Study of choice ===
=== Study of choice ===
*Three-dimensional ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for characterisation of the open spina bifida spinal lesions.<ref name="pmid24373566" />
*Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for characterisation of the open spina bifida spinal lesions.<ref name="pmid24373566">{{cite journal |vauthors=Trudell AS, Odibo AO |title=Diagnosis of spina bifida on ultrasound: always termination? |journal=Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=367–77 |date=April 2014 |pmid=24373566 |doi=10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.10.006 |url=}}</ref>
*On Three-dimensional ultrasound, spina bifida is characterized by:<ref name="pmid12054297" />
*On two and tree-dimensional ultrasound, spina bifida is characterized by:<ref name="pmid12054297">{{cite journal |vauthors=Lee W, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Williams R, McNie B, Johnson A, Treadwell M, Comstock CH |title=A diagnostic approach for the evaluation of spina bifida by three-dimensional ultrasonography |journal=J Ultrasound Med |volume=21 |issue=6 |pages=619–26 |date=June 2002 |pmid=12054297 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
**[[Vertebral anomalies|Vertebral defect]]
**[[Vertebral anomalies|Vertebral defect]]
**Splayed [[Vertebral|vertebral pedicles]]
**Splayed [[Vertebral|vertebral pedicles]]
Line 19: Line 15:


===== Sequence of Diagnostic Studies =====
===== Sequence of Diagnostic Studies =====
The Three-dimensional ultrasound must be performed when a positive [[alpha-fetoprotein]] is detected in the triple screening test during 15 to a
The [[ultrasound]] must be performed when a positive [[alpha-fetoprotein]] is detected in the triple screening test between the 15th and 20th week of pregnancy to confirm the diagnosis.<ref name="pmid4381295">{{cite journal |vauthors=Péron FG, McCarthy JL, Guerra F |title=Further studies on corticosteroidogenesis. IV. Inhibition of utilization of biological substrates for corticoid synthesis by high calcium concentrations. Possible role of transhydrogenase in corticosteroidogenesis |journal=Biochim. Biophys. Acta |volume=117 |issue=2 |pages=450–69 |date=April 1966 |pmid=4381295 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid25537246">{{cite journal |vauthors=Hu Z, Liu X, Li L, Jia C, Li D, Liu R |title=[Predictive value of abnormal second-trimester maternal serum triple screening markers for adverse pregnancy outcomes] |language=Chinese |journal=Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi |volume=49 |issue=10 |pages=749–53 |date=October 2014 |pmid=25537246 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid1071059">{{cite journal |vauthors=Wyshak G, Haase JV |title=Profile of dental hygienists |journal=Dent Hyg (Chic) |volume=50 |issue=11 |pages=497–501 |date=November 1976 |pmid=1071059 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid3111043">{{cite journal |vauthors=Shcherbukhin VV, Khramtsov AV, Zemskov VM, Filatov AV |title=[Poisson equalization of multicomponent cytofluorograms] |language=Russian |journal=Tsitologiia |volume=29 |issue=4 |pages=497–502 |date=April 1987 |pmid=3111043 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
 
20 weeks of ,yuin the patient, to confirm the diagnosis.
=== Name of Diagnostic Criteria ===
 
'''It is recommended that you include the criteria in a table. Make sure you always cite the source of the content and whether the table has been adapted from another source.'''
 
[Disease name] is primarily diagnosed based on clinical presentation. There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].
 
OR
 
There is no single diagnostic study of choice for [disease name], though [disease name] may be diagnosed based on [name of criteria] established by [...].
 
OR
 
The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met: [criterion 1], [criterion 2], [criterion 3], and [criterion 4].
 
OR
 
The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [criteria name] criteria, which includes [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].
 
OR
 
[Disease name] may be diagnosed at any time if one or more of the following criteria are met:
* Criteria 1
* Criteria 2
* Criteria 3
 
OR
 
'''IF there are clear, established diagnostic criteria'''
 
The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met: [criterion 1], [criterion 2], [criterion 3], and [criterion 4].
 
OR
 
The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [criteria name] criteria, which include [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].
 
OR
 
The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [definition name] definition, which includes [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].
 
OR
 
'''IF there are no established diagnostic criteria'''
 
There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 17:47, 29 January 2019

Spina bifida Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spina Bifida from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electroencephalogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice

Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spina bifida diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamadmostafa Jahansouz M.D.[2]

Overview

Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for characterisation of the open spina bifida spinal lesions. On two and tree-dimensional ultrasound, spina bifida is characterized by: Vertebral defect, splayed vertebral pedicles and disrupted vertebrae. The ultrasound must be performed when a positive alpha-fetoprotein is detected in the triple screening test between the 15th and 20th week of pregnancy to confirm the diagnosis.

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Study of choice

  • Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for characterisation of the open spina bifida spinal lesions.[1]
  • On two and tree-dimensional ultrasound, spina bifida is characterized by:[2]
Sequence of Diagnostic Studies

The ultrasound must be performed when a positive alpha-fetoprotein is detected in the triple screening test between the 15th and 20th week of pregnancy to confirm the diagnosis.[3][4][5][6]

References

  1. Trudell AS, Odibo AO (April 2014). "Diagnosis of spina bifida on ultrasound: always termination?". Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 28 (3): 367–77. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.10.006. PMID 24373566.
  2. Lee W, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Williams R, McNie B, Johnson A, Treadwell M, Comstock CH (June 2002). "A diagnostic approach for the evaluation of spina bifida by three-dimensional ultrasonography". J Ultrasound Med. 21 (6): 619–26. PMID 12054297.
  3. Péron FG, McCarthy JL, Guerra F (April 1966). "Further studies on corticosteroidogenesis. IV. Inhibition of utilization of biological substrates for corticoid synthesis by high calcium concentrations. Possible role of transhydrogenase in corticosteroidogenesis". Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 117 (2): 450–69. PMID 4381295.
  4. Hu Z, Liu X, Li L, Jia C, Li D, Liu R (October 2014). "[Predictive value of abnormal second-trimester maternal serum triple screening markers for adverse pregnancy outcomes]". Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi (in Chinese). 49 (10): 749–53. PMID 25537246.
  5. Wyshak G, Haase JV (November 1976). "Profile of dental hygienists". Dent Hyg (Chic). 50 (11): 497–501. PMID 1071059.
  6. Shcherbukhin VV, Khramtsov AV, Zemskov VM, Filatov AV (April 1987). "[Poisson equalization of multicomponent cytofluorograms]". Tsitologiia (in Russian). 29 (4): 497–502. PMID 3111043.

Template:WH Template:WS