CHEK1: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (task, replaced: International Journal of Cancer. Journal International Du Cancer → International Journal of Cancer (2) using AWB)
 
imported>Citation bot
m (Alter: template type, issue. Add: isbn. Formatted dashes. You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox_gene}}
{{Infobox_gene}}
'''Checkpoint kinase 1''', commonly referred to as '''Chk1''' is an [[Serine/threonine-specific protein kinase]] that in humans, is encoded by the ''CHEK1'' [[gene]].<ref name="pmid9278511">{{cite journal | vauthors = Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, Richman R, Wu Z, Piwnica-Worms H, Elledge SJ | title = Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25 | journal = Science | volume = 277 | issue = 5331 | pages = 1497–501 | date = Sep 1997 | pmid = 9278511 | pmc =  | doi = 10.1126/science.277.5331.1497 }}</ref><ref name="pmid9382850">{{cite journal | vauthors = Flaggs G, Plug AW, Dunks KM, Mundt KE, Ford JC, Quiggle MR, Taylor EM, Westphal CH, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF, Carr AM | title = Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes | journal = Current Biology | volume = 7 | issue = 12 | pages = 977–86 | date = Dec 1997 | pmid = 9382850 | pmc =  | doi = 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00417-9 }}</ref> Chk1 coordinates the DNA damage response (DDR) and cell cycle checkpoint response.<ref name="pmid24140082"/> Activation of Chk1 results in the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and cell death to prevent damaged cells from progressing through the cell cycle.
'''Checkpoint kinase 1''', commonly referred to as '''Chk1''', is a [[serine/threonine-specific protein kinase]] that, in humans, is encoded by the ''CHEK1'' [[gene]].<ref name="pmid9278511">{{cite journal | vauthors = Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, Richman R, Wu Z, Piwnica-Worms H, Elledge SJ | title = Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25 | journal = Science | volume = 277 | issue = 5331 | pages = 1497–501 | date = September 1997 | pmid = 9278511 | pmc =  | doi = 10.1126/science.277.5331.1497 }}</ref><ref name="pmid9382850">{{cite journal | vauthors = Flaggs G, Plug AW, Dunks KM, Mundt KE, Ford JC, Quiggle MR, Taylor EM, Westphal CH, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF, Carr AM | title = Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes | journal = Current Biology | volume = 7 | issue = 12 | pages = 977–86 | date = December 1997 | pmid = 9382850 | pmc =  | doi = 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00417-9 }}</ref> Chk1 coordinates the DNA damage response (DDR) and cell cycle checkpoint response.<ref name="pmid24140082"/> Activation of Chk1 results in the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and cell death to prevent damaged cells from progressing through the cell cycle.


==Discovery==
==Discovery==
In 1993, Beach and associates initially identified Chk1 as a serine/threonine kinase which regulates the G2/M phase transition in fission yeast.<ref name="pmid23613359">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhang Y, Hunter T | title = Roles of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer therapy | journal = International Journal of Cancer | volume = 134 | issue = 5 | pages = 1013–23 | date = Mar 2014 | pmid = 23613359 | doi = 10.1002/ijc.28226 }}</ref> Constitutive expression of Chk1 in fission yeast was shown to induce cell cycle arrest.  The same gene called Rad27 was identified in budding yeast by Carr and associates. In 1997, homologs were identified in more complex organisms including the fruit fly, human and mouse.<ref name="pmid23508805">{{cite journal | vauthors = Patil M, Pabla N, Dong Z | title = Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation | journal = Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences | volume = 70 | issue = 21 | pages = 4009–21 | date = Nov 2013 | pmid = 23508805 | doi = 10.1007/s00018-013-1307-3 }}</ref> Through these findings, it is apparent Chk1 is highly conserved from yeast to humans.<ref name="pmid9278511" />
In 1993, Beach and associates initially identified Chk1 as a serine/threonine kinase which regulates the G2/M phase transition in fission yeast.<ref name="pmid23613359">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhang Y, Hunter T | title = Roles of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer therapy | journal = International Journal of Cancer | volume = 134 | issue = 5 | pages = 1013–23 | date = March 2014 | pmid = 23613359 | pmc = 3852170 | doi = 10.1002/ijc.28226 }}</ref> Constitutive expression of Chk1 in fission yeast was shown to induce cell cycle arrest.  The same gene called Rad27 was identified in budding yeast by Carr and associates. In 1997, homologs were identified in more complex organisms including the fruit fly, human and mouse.<ref name="pmid23508805">{{cite journal | vauthors = Patil M, Pabla N, Dong Z | title = Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation | journal = Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences | volume = 70 | issue = 21 | pages = 4009–21 | date = November 2013 | pmid = 23508805 | pmc = 3731415 | doi = 10.1007/s00018-013-1307-3 }}</ref> Through these findings, it is apparent Chk1 is highly conserved from yeast to humans.<ref name="pmid9278511" />


==Structure==
== Structure ==
Human Chk1 is located on chromosome 11 on the cytogenic band 11q22-23. Chk1 has a N-terminal kinase domain, a linker region, a regulatory SQ/TQ domain and a C-terminal domain.<ref name=pmid23508805 /> Chk1 contains four Ser/Gln residues.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> Chk 1 activation occurs primarily through the phosphorylation of the conserved sites, Ser-317, Ser-345 and less often at Ser-366.<ref name=pmid23613359 /><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Caparelli ML, O'Connell MJ | title = Regulatory motifs in Chk1 | journal = Cell Cycle | volume = 12 | issue = 6 | pages = 916–22 | date = Mar 2013 | pmid = 23422000 | pmc = 3637350 | doi = 10.4161/cc.23881 }}</ref>
Human Chk1 is located on chromosome 11 on the cytogenic band 11q22-23. Chk1 has a N-terminal kinase domain, a linker region, a regulatory SQ/TQ domain and a C-terminal domain.<ref name=pmid23508805 /> Chk1 contains four Ser/Gln residues.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> Chk 1 activation occurs primarily through the phosphorylation of the conserved sites, Ser-317, Ser-345 and less often at Ser-366.<ref name=pmid23613359 /><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Caparelli ML, O'Connell MJ | title = Regulatory motifs in Chk1 | journal = Cell Cycle | volume = 12 | issue = 6 | pages = 916–22 | date = March 2013 | pmid = 23422000 | pmc = 3637350 | doi = 10.4161/cc.23881 }}</ref>


== Function ==
== Function ==
Line 17: Line 17:


===G2/M transition===
===G2/M transition===
In response to DNA damage, Chk1 is an important signal transducer for G2/M checkpoint activation. Activation of Chk1 holds the cell in the G2 phase until ready to enter the mitotic phase. This delay allows time for DNA to repair or cell death to occur if DNA damage is irreversible.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Meuth M | title = Chk1 suppressed cell death | journal = Cell Division | volume = 5 | pages = 21 | date = 2010 | pmid = 20813042 | pmc = 2939633 | doi = 10.1186/1747-1028-5-21 }}</ref> Chk1 must inactivate in order for the cell to transition from the G2 phase into mitosis, Chk1 expression levels are mediated by regulatory proteins.
In response to DNA damage, Chk1 is an important signal transducer for G2/M checkpoint activation. Activation of Chk1 holds the cell in the G2 phase until ready to enter the mitotic phase. This delay allows time for DNA to repair or cell death to occur if DNA damage is irreversible.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Meuth M | title = Chk1 suppressed cell death | journal = Cell Division | volume = 5 | pages = 21 | date = September 2010 | pmid = 20813042 | pmc = 2939633 | doi = 10.1186/1747-1028-5-21 }}</ref> Chk1 must inactivate in order for the cell to transition from the G2 phase into mitosis, Chk1 expression levels are mediated by regulatory proteins.


===M phase===
===M phase===
Line 31: Line 31:
However, activation of Chk1 is not solely dependent on ATR, intermediate proteins involved in DNA replication are often necessary. Regulatory proteins such as replication protein A, Claspin, Tim/Tipin, Rad 17, TopBP1 may be involved to facilitate Chk1 activation. Additional protein interactions are involved to induce maximal phosphorylation of Chk1. Chk1 activation can also be ATR-independent through interactions with other protein kinases such as PKB/AKT, MAPKAPK and p90/RSK.<ref name=pmid23613359 />
However, activation of Chk1 is not solely dependent on ATR, intermediate proteins involved in DNA replication are often necessary. Regulatory proteins such as replication protein A, Claspin, Tim/Tipin, Rad 17, TopBP1 may be involved to facilitate Chk1 activation. Additional protein interactions are involved to induce maximal phosphorylation of Chk1. Chk1 activation can also be ATR-independent through interactions with other protein kinases such as PKB/AKT, MAPKAPK and p90/RSK.<ref name=pmid23613359 />


Also, Chk1 has been shown to be activated by the Scc1 subunit of the protein cohesin, in zygotes.<ref>http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(16)31530-6</ref>
Also, Chk1 has been shown to be activated by the Scc1 subunit of the protein cohesin, in zygotes.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Ladstätter S, Tachibana-Konwalski K | title = A Surveillance Mechanism Ensures Repair of DNA Lesions during Zygotic Reprogramming | journal = Cell | volume = 167 | issue = 7 | pages = 1774–1787.e13 | date = December 2016 | pmid = 27916276 | pmc = 5161750 | doi = 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.009 | url = http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(16)31530-6 }}</ref>


===Cell cycle arrest===
===Cell cycle arrest===
Chk1 interacts with many downstream effectors to induce cell cycle arrest. In response to DNA damage, Chk1 primarily phosphorylates Cdc25 which results in its proteasomal degradation.<ref name=pmid23508805 /> The degradation has an inhibitory effect on the formation of cyclin-dependent kinase complexes, which are key drivers of the cell cycle.<ref name="pmid10859164">{{cite journal | vauthors = Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, Luo G, Carattini-Rivera S, DeMayo F, Bradley A, Donehower LA, Elledge SJ | title = Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 14 | issue = 12 | pages = 1448–59 | date = Jun 2000 | pmid = 10859164 | pmc = 316686 | doi = 10.1101/gad.840500 }}</ref> Through targeting Cdc25, cell cycle arrest can occur at multiple time points including the G1/S transition, S phase and G2/M transition.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> Furthermore, Chk1 can target Cdc25 indirectly through phosphorylating Nek11.
Chk1 interacts with many downstream effectors to induce cell cycle arrest. In response to DNA damage, Chk1 primarily phosphorylates Cdc25 which results in its proteasomal degradation.<ref name=pmid23508805 /> The degradation has an inhibitory effect on the formation of cyclin-dependent kinase complexes, which are key drivers of the cell cycle.<ref name="pmid10859164">{{cite journal | vauthors = Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, Luo G, Carattini-Rivera S, DeMayo F, Bradley A, Donehower LA, Elledge SJ | title = Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 14 | issue = 12 | pages = 1448–59 | date = June 2000 | pmid = 10859164 | pmc = 316686 | doi = 10.1101/gad.840500 }}</ref> Through targeting Cdc25, cell cycle arrest can occur at multiple time points including the G1/S transition, S phase and G2/M transition.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> Furthermore, Chk1 can target Cdc25 indirectly through phosphorylating Nek11.


WEE1 kinase and PLK1 are also targeted by Chk1 to induce cell cycle arrest. Phosphorylation of WEE1 kinase inhibits cdk1 which results in cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase.<ref name=pmid23613359 />
WEE1 kinase and PLK1 are also targeted by Chk1 to induce cell cycle arrest. Phosphorylation of WEE1 kinase inhibits cdk1 which results in cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase.<ref name=pmid23613359 />
Line 44: Line 44:


==Clinical relevance==
==Clinical relevance==
Chk1 has a central role in coordinating the DNA damage response and therefore is an area of great interest in oncology and the development of cancer therapeutics.<ref name="pmid22435685">{{cite journal | vauthors = Goto H, Izawa I, Li P, Inagaki M | title = Novel regulation of checkpoint kinase 1: Is checkpoint kinase 1 a good candidate for anti-cancer therapy? | journal = Cancer Science | volume = 103 | issue = 7 | pages = 1195–200 | date = Jul 2012 | pmid = 22435685 | doi = 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02280.x }}</ref> Initially Chk1 was thought to function as a tumor suppressor due to the regulatory role it serves amongst cells with DNA damage. However, there has been no evidence of homozygous loss of function mutants for Chk1 in human tumors.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> Instead, Chk1 has been shown to be overexpressed in a numerous tumors including breast, colon, liver, gastric and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> There is a positive correlation with Chk1 expression and tumor grade and disease recurrence suggesting Chk1 may promote tumor growth.<ref name=pmid23613359 /><ref name=pmid23508805 /><ref name=pmid22435685 /> Chk1 is essential for cell survival and through high levels of expressions in tumors the function may be inducing tumor cell proliferation. Further, a study has demonstrated that targeting CHK1 reactivates the tumour suppressive activity of  protein phosphtase 2A (PP2A) complex in cancer cells.<ref name="pmid24072747">{{cite journal | vauthors = Khanna A, Kauko O, Böckelman C, Laine A, Schreck I, Partanen JI, Szwajda A, Bormann S, Bilgen T, Helenius M, Pokharel YR, Pimanda J, Russel MR, Haglund C, Cole KA, Klefström J, Aittokallio T, Weiss C, Ristimäki A, Visakorpi T, Westermarck J | title = Chk1 targeting reactivates PP2A tumor suppressor activity in cancer cells | journal = Cancer Research | volume = 73 | issue = 22 | pages = 6757–69 | date = Nov 2013 | pmid = 24072747 | pmc = 3870284 | doi = 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1002 }}</ref> Studies have shown complete loss of Chk1 suppresses chemically induce carcinogenesis however Chk1 haploinsufficiency results in tumor progression.<ref name=pmid23508805 />
Chk1 has a central role in coordinating the DNA damage response and therefore is an area of great interest in oncology and the development of cancer therapeutics.<ref name="pmid22435685">{{cite journal | vauthors = Goto H, Izawa I, Li P, Inagaki M | title = Novel regulation of checkpoint kinase 1: Is checkpoint kinase 1 a good candidate for anti-cancer therapy? | journal = Cancer Science | volume = 103 | issue = 7 | pages = 1195–200 | date = July 2012 | pmid = 22435685 | doi = 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02280.x }}</ref> Initially Chk1 was thought to function as a tumor suppressor due to the regulatory role it serves amongst cells with DNA damage. However, there has been no evidence of homozygous loss of function mutants for Chk1 in human tumors.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> Instead, Chk1 has been shown to be overexpressed in a numerous tumors including breast, colon, liver, gastric and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.<ref name=pmid23613359 /> There is a positive correlation with Chk1 expression and tumor grade and disease recurrence suggesting Chk1 may promote tumor growth.<ref name=pmid23613359 /><ref name=pmid23508805 /><ref name=pmid22435685 /> Chk1 is essential for cell survival and through high levels of expressions in tumors the function may be inducing tumor cell proliferation. Further, a study has demonstrated that targeting CHK1 reactivates the tumour suppressive activity of  protein phosphtase 2A (PP2A) complex in cancer cells.<ref name="pmid24072747">{{cite journal | vauthors = Khanna A, Kauko O, Böckelman C, Laine A, Schreck I, Partanen JI, Szwajda A, Bormann S, Bilgen T, Helenius M, Pokharel YR, Pimanda J, Russel MR, Haglund C, Cole KA, Klefström J, Aittokallio T, Weiss C, Ristimäki A, Visakorpi T, Westermarck J | title = Chk1 targeting reactivates PP2A tumor suppressor activity in cancer cells | journal = Cancer Research | volume = 73 | issue = 22 | pages = 6757–69 | date = November 2013 | pmid = 24072747 | pmc = 3870284 | doi = 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1002 }}</ref> Studies have shown complete loss of Chk1 suppresses chemically induce carcinogenesis however Chk1 haploinsufficiency results in tumor progression.<ref name=pmid23508805 />
Due to the possibility of Chk1 involvement in tumor promotion, the kinase and related signaling molecules may be potentially effective therapeutic targets. Cancer therapies utilize DNA damaging therapies such as chemotherapies and ionizing radiation to inhibit tumor cell proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest.<ref name="pmid21034966">{{cite journal | vauthors = Smith J, Tho LM, Xu N, Gillespie DA | title = The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer | journal = Advances in Cancer Research | volume = 108 | issue =  | pages = 73–112 | year = 2010 | pmid = 21034966 | doi = 10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0 }}</ref> Tumor cells with increased levels of Chk1 acquire survival advantages due to the ability to tolerate a higher level of DNA damage. Therefore, Chk1 may contribute to chemotherapy resistance.<ref name="pmid19034564">{{cite journal | vauthors = Liang Y, Lin SY, Brunicardi FC, Goss J, Li K | title = DNA damage response pathways in tumor suppression and cancer treatment | journal = World Journal of Surgery | volume = 33 | issue = 4 | pages = 661–6 | date = Apr 2009 | pmid = 19034564 | doi = 10.1007/s00268-008-9840-1 }}</ref> In order to optimize chemotherapies, Chk1 must be inhibited to reduce the survival advantage.<ref name="pmid24140082">{{cite journal | vauthors = McNeely S, Beckmann R, Bence Lin AK | title = CHEK again: revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy | journal = Pharmacology & Therapeutics | volume = 142 | issue = 1 | pages = 1–10 | date = Apr 2014 | pmid = 24140082 | doi = 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.005 }}</ref>  Chk1 gene can be  effectively silenced by siRNA knockdown for further analysis based on an  independent validation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Munkácsy|first=Gyöngyi|last2=Sztupinszki|first2=Zsófia|last3=Herman|first3=Péter|last4=Bán|first4=Bence|last5=Pénzváltó|first5=Zsófia|last6=Szarvas|first6=Nóra|last7=Győrffy|first7=Balázs|date=2016-01-01|title=Validation of RNAi Silencing Efficiency Using Gene Array Data shows 18.5% Failure Rate across 429 Independent Experiments|url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2162253117300859|journal=Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids|language=English|volume=5|doi=10.1038/mtna.2016.66|issn=2162-2531|pmc=5056990|pmid=27673562}}</ref> By inhibiting Chk1, cancer cells lose the ability to repair damaged DNA which allows chemotherapeutic agents to work more effectively. Combining DNA damaging therapies such as chemotherapy or radiation treatment with Chk1 inhibition enhances targeted cell death and provides synthetic lethality.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Toledo LI, Murga M, Fernandez-Capetillo O | title = Targeting ATR and Chk1 kinases for cancer treatment: a new model for new (and old) drugs | journal = Molecular Oncology | volume = 5 | issue = 4 | pages = 368–73 | date = Aug 2011 | pmid = 21820372 | pmc = 3590794 | doi = 10.1016/j.molonc.2011.07.002 }}</ref> Many cancers rely on Chk1 mediated cell cycle arrest heavily especially if cancers are deficient in p53.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Chen Z, Xiao Z, Gu WZ, Xue J, Bui MH, Kovar P, Li G, Wang G, Tao ZF, Tong Y, Lin NH, Sham HL, Wang JY, Sowin TJ, Rosenberg SH, Zhang H | title = Selective Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize p53-deficient cancer cells to cancer therapeutics | journal = International Journal of Cancer | volume = 119 | issue = 12 | pages = 2784–94 | date = Dec 2006 | pmid = 17019715 | doi = 10.1002/ijc.22198 }}</ref> Approximately 50% of cancers possess p53 mutations illustrating the dependence that many cancers may have on the Chk1 pathway.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Maugeri-Saccà M, Bartucci M, De Maria R | title = Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors for potentiating systemic anticancer therapy | journal = Cancer Treatment Reviews | volume = 39 | issue = 5 | pages = 525–33 | date = Aug 2013 | pmid = 23207059 | doi = 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.10.007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Tao ZF, Lin NH | title = Chk1 inhibitors for novel cancer treatment | journal = Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry | volume = 6 | issue = 4 | pages = 377–88 | date = Jul 2006 | pmid = 16842237 | doi=10.2174/187152006777698132}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Ma CX, Janetka JW, Piwnica-Worms H | title = Death by releasing the breaks: CHK1 inhibitors as cancer therapeutics | journal = Trends in Molecular Medicine | volume = 17 | issue = 2 | pages = 88–96 | date = Feb 2011 | pmid = 21087899 | doi = 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.009 }}</ref> Inhibition of Chk1 allows selective targeting of p53 mutant cells as Chk1 levels are more likely to highly expressed in tumor cells with p53 deficiencies.<ref name="pmid22435685"/><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Zenvirt S, Kravchenko-Balasha N, Levitzki A | title = Status of p53 in human cancer cells does not predict efficacy of CHK1 kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapeutic agents | journal = Oncogene | volume = 29 | issue = 46 | pages = 6149–59 | date = Nov 2010 | pmid = 20729914 | doi = 10.1038/onc.2010.343 }}</ref> Even though this method of inhibition is highly targeted, recent research has shown Chk1 also has a role in the normal cell cycle.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Thompson R, Eastman A | title = The cancer therapeutic potential of Chk1 inhibitors: how mechanistic studies impact on clinical trial design | journal = British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | volume = 76 | issue = 3 | pages = 358–69 | date = Sep 2013 | pmid = 23593991 | doi = 10.1111/bcp.12139 }}</ref> Therefore, off-target effects and toxicity associated with combination therapies using CHk1 inhibitors must be considered during development of novel therapies.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Dent P, Tang Y, Yacoub A, Dai Y, Fisher PB, Grant S | title = CHK1 inhibitors in combination chemotherapy: thinking beyond the cell cycle | journal = Molecular Interventions | volume = 11 | issue = 2 | pages = 133–40 | date = Apr 2011 | pmid = 21540473 | pmc = 3109860 | doi = 10.1124/mi.11.2.11 }}</ref>
Due to the possibility of Chk1 involvement in tumor promotion, the kinase and related signaling molecules may be potentially effective therapeutic targets. Cancer therapies utilize DNA damaging therapies such as chemotherapies and ionizing radiation to inhibit tumor cell proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest.<ref name="pmid21034966">{{Cite book | vauthors = Smith J, Tho LM, Xu N, Gillespie DA | title = The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer | journal = Advances in Cancer Research | volume = 108 | issue =  | pages = 73–112 | year = 2010 | pmid = 21034966 | doi = 10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0 | isbn = 9780123808882 }}</ref> Tumor cells with increased levels of Chk1 acquire survival advantages due to the ability to tolerate a higher level of DNA damage. Therefore, Chk1 may contribute to chemotherapy resistance.<ref name="pmid19034564">{{cite journal | vauthors = Liang Y, Lin SY, Brunicardi FC, Goss J, Li K | title = DNA damage response pathways in tumor suppression and cancer treatment | journal = World Journal of Surgery | volume = 33 | issue = 4 | pages = 661–6 | date = April 2009 | pmid = 19034564 | doi = 10.1007/s00268-008-9840-1 }}</ref> In order to optimize chemotherapies, Chk1 must be inhibited to reduce the survival advantage.<ref name="pmid24140082">{{cite journal | vauthors = McNeely S, Beckmann R, Bence Lin AK | title = CHEK again: revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy | journal = Pharmacology & Therapeutics | volume = 142 | issue = 1 | pages = 1–10 | date = April 2014 | pmid = 24140082 | doi = 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.005 }}</ref>  Chk1 gene can be  effectively silenced by siRNA knockdown for further analysis based on an  independent validation.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Munkácsy G, Sztupinszki Z, Herman P, Bán B, Pénzváltó Z, Szarvas N, Győrffy B | title = Validation of RNAi Silencing Efficiency Using Gene Array Data shows 18.5% Failure Rate across 429 Independent Experiments | language = English | journal = Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids | volume = 5 | issue = 9 | pages = e366 | date = September 2016 | pmid = 27673562 | pmc = 5056990 | doi = 10.1038/mtna.2016.66 }}</ref> By inhibiting Chk1, cancer cells lose the ability to repair damaged DNA which allows chemotherapeutic agents to work more effectively. Combining DNA damaging therapies such as chemotherapy or radiation treatment with Chk1 inhibition enhances targeted cell death and provides synthetic lethality.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Toledo LI, Murga M, Fernandez-Capetillo O | title = Targeting ATR and Chk1 kinases for cancer treatment: a new model for new (and old) drugs | journal = Molecular Oncology | volume = 5 | issue = 4 | pages = 368–73 | date = August 2011 | pmid = 21820372 | pmc = 3590794 | doi = 10.1016/j.molonc.2011.07.002 }}</ref> Many cancers rely on Chk1 mediated cell cycle arrest heavily especially if cancers are deficient in p53.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Chen Z, Xiao Z, Gu WZ, Xue J, Bui MH, Kovar P, Li G, Wang G, Tao ZF, Tong Y, Lin NH, Sham HL, Wang JY, Sowin TJ, Rosenberg SH, Zhang H | title = Selective Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize p53-deficient cancer cells to cancer therapeutics | journal = International Journal of Cancer | volume = 119 | issue = 12 | pages = 2784–94 | date = December 2006 | pmid = 17019715 | doi = 10.1002/ijc.22198 }}</ref> Approximately 50% of cancers possess p53 mutations illustrating the dependence that many cancers may have on the Chk1 pathway.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Maugeri-Saccà M, Bartucci M, De Maria R | title = Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors for potentiating systemic anticancer therapy | journal = Cancer Treatment Reviews | volume = 39 | issue = 5 | pages = 525–33 | date = August 2013 | pmid = 23207059 | doi = 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.10.007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Tao ZF, Lin NH | title = Chk1 inhibitors for novel cancer treatment | journal = Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry | volume = 6 | issue = 4 | pages = 377–88 | date = July 2006 | pmid = 16842237 | doi = 10.2174/187152006777698132 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Ma CX, Janetka JW, Piwnica-Worms H | title = Death by releasing the breaks: CHK1 inhibitors as cancer therapeutics | journal = Trends in Molecular Medicine | volume = 17 | issue = 2 | pages = 88–96 | date = February 2011 | pmid = 21087899 | doi = 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.009 }}</ref> Inhibition of Chk1 allows selective targeting of p53 mutant cells as Chk1 levels are more likely to highly expressed in tumor cells with p53 deficiencies.<ref name="pmid22435685"/><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Zenvirt S, Kravchenko-Balasha N, Levitzki A | title = Status of p53 in human cancer cells does not predict efficacy of CHK1 kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapeutic agents | journal = Oncogene | volume = 29 | issue = 46 | pages = 6149–59 | date = November 2010 | pmid = 20729914 | doi = 10.1038/onc.2010.343 }}</ref> Even though this method of inhibition is highly targeted, recent research has shown Chk1 also has a role in the normal cell cycle.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Thompson R, Eastman A | title = The cancer therapeutic potential of Chk1 inhibitors: how mechanistic studies impact on clinical trial design | journal = British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | volume = 76 | issue = 3 | pages = 358–69 | date = September 2013 | pmid = 23593991 | pmc = 3769664 | doi = 10.1111/bcp.12139 }}</ref> Therefore, off-target effects and toxicity associated with combination therapies using CHk1 inhibitors must be considered during development of novel therapies.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Dent P, Tang Y, Yacoub A, Dai Y, Fisher PB, Grant S | title = CHK1 inhibitors in combination chemotherapy: thinking beyond the cell cycle | journal = Molecular Interventions | volume = 11 | issue = 2 | pages = 133–40 | date = April 2011 | pmid = 21540473 | pmc = 3109860 | doi = 10.1124/mi.11.2.11 }}</ref>


==Meiosis==
==Meiosis==
During [[meiosis]] in human and mouse, CHEK1 protein kinase is important for integrating DNA damage repair with cell cycle arrest.<ref name=Flaggs>{{cite journal | vauthors = Flaggs G, Plug AW, Dunks KM, Mundt KE, Ford JC, Quiggle MR, Taylor EM, Westphal CH, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF, Carr AM | title = Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes | journal = Current Biology | volume = 7 | issue = 12 | pages = 977–86 | date = Dec 1997 | pmid = 9382850 | doi = 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00417-9}}</ref>  CHEK1 is expressed in the [[Testicle|testes]] and associates with meiotic [[synaptonemal complex]]es during the [[Meiosis#zygotene|zygonema]] and [[Meiosis#pacytene|pachynema]] stages.<ref name=Flaggs />  CHEK1 likely acts as an integrator for [[Ataxia telangiectasia mutated|ATM]] and [[Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related|ATR]] signals and may be involved in monitoring meiotic [[Genetic recombination|recombination]].<ref name=Flaggs />  In mouse [[oocyte]]s CHEK1 appears to be indispensable for [[Meiosis#Prophase I|prophase I]] arrest and to function at the [[G2-M DNA damage checkpoint|G2/M checkpoint]].<ref name="pmid22544319">{{cite journal | vauthors = Chen L, Chao SB, Wang ZB, Qi ST, Zhu XL, Yang SW, Yang CR, Zhang QH, Ouyang YC, Hou Y, Schatten H, Sun QY | title = Checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for meiotic cell cycle regulation in mouse oocytes | journal = Cell Cycle | volume = 11 | issue = 10 | pages = 1948–55 | date = May 2012 | pmid = 22544319 | doi = 10.4161/cc.20279 }}</ref>
During [[meiosis]] in human and mouse, CHEK1 protein kinase is important for integrating DNA damage repair with cell cycle arrest.<ref name=Flaggs>{{cite journal | vauthors = Flaggs G, Plug AW, Dunks KM, Mundt KE, Ford JC, Quiggle MR, Taylor EM, Westphal CH, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF, Carr AM | title = Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes | journal = Current Biology | volume = 7 | issue = 12 | pages = 977–86 | date = December 1997 | pmid = 9382850 | doi = 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00417-9 }}</ref>  CHEK1 is expressed in the [[Testicle|testes]] and associates with meiotic [[synaptonemal complex]]es during the [[Meiosis#zygotene|zygonema]] and [[Meiosis#pacytene|pachynema]] stages.<ref name=Flaggs />  CHEK1 likely acts as an integrator for [[Ataxia telangiectasia mutated|ATM]] and [[Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related|ATR]] signals and may be involved in monitoring meiotic [[Genetic recombination|recombination]].<ref name=Flaggs />  In mouse [[oocyte]]s CHEK1 appears to be indispensable for [[Meiosis#Prophase I|prophase I]] arrest and to function at the [[G2-M DNA damage checkpoint|G2/M checkpoint]].<ref name="pmid22544319">{{cite journal | vauthors = Chen L, Chao SB, Wang ZB, Qi ST, Zhu XL, Yang SW, Yang CR, Zhang QH, Ouyang YC, Hou Y, Schatten H, Sun QY | title = Checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for meiotic cell cycle regulation in mouse oocytes | journal = Cell Cycle | volume = 11 | issue = 10 | pages = 1948–55 | date = May 2012 | pmid = 22544319 | doi = 10.4161/cc.20279 }}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 59: Line 59:
== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
{{refbegin|35em}}
{{refbegin|35em}}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Giaccia AJ, Kastan MB | title = The complexity of p53 modulation: emerging patterns from divergent signals | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 12 | issue = 19 | pages = 2973–83 | date = Oct 1998 | pmid = 9765199 | doi = 10.1101/gad.12.19.2973 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Giaccia AJ, Kastan MB | title = The complexity of p53 modulation: emerging patterns from divergent signals | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 12 | issue = 19 | pages = 2973–83 | date = October 1998 | pmid = 9765199 | doi = 10.1101/gad.12.19.2973 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Kastan MB, Lim DS | title = The many substrates and functions of ATM | journal = Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology | volume = 1 | issue = 3 | pages = 179–86 | date = Dec 2000 | pmid = 11252893 | doi = 10.1038/35043058 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Kastan MB, Lim DS | title = The many substrates and functions of ATM | journal = Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology | volume = 1 | issue = 3 | pages = 179–86 | date = December 2000 | pmid = 11252893 | doi = 10.1038/35043058 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Chini CC, Chen J | title = Claspin, a regulator of Chk1 in DNA replication stress pathway | journal = DNA Repair | volume = 3 | issue = 8-9 | pages = 1033–7 | year = 2005 | pmid = 15279790 | doi = 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.001 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Chini CC, Chen J | title = Claspin, a regulator of Chk1 in DNA replication stress pathway | journal = DNA Repair | volume = 3 | issue = 8–9 | pages = 1033–7 | year = 2005 | pmid = 15279790 | doi = 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.001 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Peng CY, Graves PR, Thoma RS, Wu Z, Shaw AS, Piwnica-Worms H | title = Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216 | journal = Science | volume = 277 | issue = 5331 | pages = 1501–5 | date = Sep 1997 | pmid = 9278512 | doi = 10.1126/science.277.5331.1501 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Peng CY, Graves PR, Thoma RS, Wu Z, Shaw AS, Piwnica-Worms H | title = Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216 | journal = Science | volume = 277 | issue = 5331 | pages = 1501–5 | date = September 1997 | pmid = 9278512 | doi = 10.1126/science.277.5331.1501 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Ouyang B, Li W, Pan H, Meadows J, Hoffmann I, Dai W | title = The physical association and phosphorylation of Cdc25C protein phosphatase by Prk | journal = Oncogene | volume = 18 | issue = 44 | pages = 6029–36 | date = Oct 1999 | pmid = 10557092 | doi = 10.1038/sj.onc.1202983 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Ouyang B, Li W, Pan H, Meadows J, Hoffmann I, Dai W | title = The physical association and phosphorylation of Cdc25C protein phosphatase by Prk | journal = Oncogene | volume = 18 | issue = 44 | pages = 6029–36 | date = October 1999 | pmid = 10557092 | doi = 10.1038/sj.onc.1202983 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB | title = Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members | journal = The Journal of Biological Chemistry | volume = 274 | issue = 53 | pages = 37538–43 | date = Dec 1999 | pmid = 10608806 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37538 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB | title = Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members | journal = The Journal of Biological Chemistry | volume = 274 | issue = 53 | pages = 37538–43 | date = December 1999 | pmid = 10608806 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37538 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Shieh SY, Ahn J, Tamai K, Taya Y, Prives C | title = The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 14 | issue = 3 | pages = 289–300 | date = Feb 2000 | pmid = 10673501 | pmc = 316358 | doi =  }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Shieh SY, Ahn J, Tamai K, Taya Y, Prives C | title = The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 14 | issue = 3 | pages = 289–300 | date = February 2000 | pmid = 10673501 | pmc = 316358 | doi =  }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Graves PR, Yu L, Schwarz JK, Gales J, Sausville EA, O'Connor PM, Piwnica-Worms H | title = The Chk1 protein kinase and the Cdc25C regulatory pathways are targets of the anticancer agent UCN-01 | journal = The Journal of Biological Chemistry | volume = 275 | issue = 8 | pages = 5600–5 | date = Feb 2000 | pmid = 10681541 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5600 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Graves PR, Yu L, Schwarz JK, Gales J, Sausville EA, O'Connor PM, Piwnica-Worms H | title = The Chk1 protein kinase and the Cdc25C regulatory pathways are targets of the anticancer agent UCN-01 | journal = The Journal of Biological Chemistry | volume = 275 | issue = 8 | pages = 5600–5 | date = February 2000 | pmid = 10681541 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5600 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Semba S, Ouyang H, Han SY, Kato Y, Horii A | title = Analysis of the candidate target genes for mutation in microsatellite instability-positive cancers of the colorectum, stomach, and endometrium | journal = International Journal of Oncology | volume = 16 | issue = 4 | pages = 731–7 | date = Apr 2000 | pmid = 10717241 | doi = 10.3892/ijo.16.4.731 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Semba S, Ouyang H, Han SY, Kato Y, Horii A | title = Analysis of the candidate target genes for mutation in microsatellite instability-positive cancers of the colorectum, stomach, and endometrium | journal = International Journal of Oncology | volume = 16 | issue = 4 | pages = 731–7 | date = April 2000 | pmid = 10717241 | doi = 10.3892/ijo.16.4.731 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Chen P, Luo C, Deng Y, Ryan K, Register J, Margosiak S, Tempczyk-Russell A, Nguyen B, Myers P, Lundgren K, Kan CC, O'Connor PM | title = The 1.7 A crystal structure of human cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1: implications for Chk1 regulation | journal = Cell | volume = 100 | issue = 6 | pages = 681–92 | date = Mar 2000 | pmid = 10761933 | doi = 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80704-7 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Chen P, Luo C, Deng Y, Ryan K, Register J, Margosiak S, Tempczyk-Russell A, Nguyen B, Myers P, Lundgren K, Kan CC, O'Connor PM | title = The 1.7 A crystal structure of human cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1: implications for Chk1 regulation | journal = Cell | volume = 100 | issue = 6 | pages = 681–92 | date = March 2000 | pmid = 10761933 | doi = 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80704-7 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, Luo G, Carattini-Rivera S, DeMayo F, Bradley A, Donehower LA, Elledge SJ | title = Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 14 | issue = 12 | pages = 1448–59 | date = Jun 2000 | pmid = 10859164 | pmc = 316686 | doi = 10.1101/gad.840500 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, Luo G, Carattini-Rivera S, DeMayo F, Bradley A, Donehower LA, Elledge SJ | title = Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint | journal = Genes & Development | volume = 14 | issue = 12 | pages = 1448–59 | date = June 2000 | pmid = 10859164 | pmc = 316686 | doi = 10.1101/gad.840500 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Bulavin DV, Higashimoto Y, Popoff IJ, Gaarde WA, Basrur V, Potapova O, Appella E, Fornace AJ | title = Initiation of a G2/M checkpoint after ultraviolet radiation requires p38 kinase | journal = Nature | volume = 411 | issue = 6833 | pages = 102–7 | date = May 2001 | pmid = 11333986 | doi = 10.1038/35075107 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Bulavin DV, Higashimoto Y, Popoff IJ, Gaarde WA, Basrur V, Potapova O, Appella E, Fornace AJ | title = Initiation of a G2/M checkpoint after ultraviolet radiation requires p38 kinase | journal = Nature | volume = 411 | issue = 6833 | pages = 102–7 | date = May 2001 | pmid = 11333986 | doi = 10.1038/35075107 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Zhao H, Piwnica-Worms H | title = ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1 | journal = Molecular and Cellular Biology | volume = 21 | issue = 13 | pages = 4129–39 | date = Jul 2001 | pmid = 11390642 | pmc = 87074 | doi = 10.1128/MCB.21.13.4129-4139.2001 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Zhao H, Piwnica-Worms H | title = ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1 | journal = Molecular and Cellular Biology | volume = 21 | issue = 13 | pages = 4129–39 | date = July 2001 | pmid = 11390642 | pmc = 87074 | doi = 10.1128/MCB.21.13.4129-4139.2001 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Feijoo C, Hall-Jackson C, Wu R, Jenkins D, Leitch J, Gilbert DM, Smythe C | title = Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing | journal = The Journal of Cell Biology | volume = 154 | issue = 5 | pages = 913–23 | date = Sep 2001 | pmid = 11535615 | pmc = 1255922 | doi = 10.1083/jcb.200104099 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Feijoo C, Hall-Jackson C, Wu R, Jenkins D, Leitch J, Gilbert DM, Smythe C | title = Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing | journal = The Journal of Cell Biology | volume = 154 | issue = 5 | pages = 913–23 | date = September 2001 | pmid = 11535615 | pmc = 1255922 | doi = 10.1083/jcb.200104099 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Xie S, Wu H, Wang Q, Cogswell JP, Husain I, Conn C, Stambrook P, Jhanwar-Uniyal M, Dai W | title = Plk3 functionally links DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis at least in part via the p53 pathway | journal = The Journal of Biological Chemistry | volume = 276 | issue = 46 | pages = 43305–12 | date = Nov 2001 | pmid = 11551930 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.M106050200 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Xie S, Wu H, Wang Q, Cogswell JP, Husain I, Conn C, Stambrook P, Jhanwar-Uniyal M, Dai W | title = Plk3 functionally links DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis at least in part via the p53 pathway | journal = The Journal of Biological Chemistry | volume = 276 | issue = 46 | pages = 43305–12 | date = November 2001 | pmid = 11551930 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.M106050200 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Latonen L, Taya Y, Laiho M | title = UV-radiation induces dose-dependent regulation of p53 response and modulates p53-HDM2 interaction in human fibroblasts | journal = Oncogene | volume = 20 | issue = 46 | pages = 6784–93 | date = Oct 2001 | pmid = 11709713 | doi = 10.1038/sj.onc.1204883 }}
* {{cite journal | vauthors = Latonen L, Taya Y, Laiho M | title = UV-radiation induces dose-dependent regulation of p53 response and modulates p53-HDM2 interaction in human fibroblasts | journal = Oncogene | volume = 20 | issue = 46 | pages = 6784–93 | date = October 2001 | pmid = 11709713 | doi = 10.1038/sj.onc.1204883 }}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


==External links==
== External links ==
* {{UCSC gene info|CHEK1}}
* {{UCSC gene info|CHEK1}}
{{PDB Gallery|geneid=1111}}
{{PDB Gallery|geneid=1111}}

Latest revision as of 13:09, 7 November 2018

VALUE_ERROR (nil)
Identifiers
Aliases
External IDsGeneCards: [1]
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez
Ensembl
UniProt
RefSeq (mRNA)

n/a

n/a

RefSeq (protein)

n/a

n/a

Location (UCSC)n/an/a
PubMed searchn/an/a
Wikidata
View/Edit Human

Checkpoint kinase 1, commonly referred to as Chk1, is a serine/threonine-specific protein kinase that, in humans, is encoded by the CHEK1 gene.[1][2] Chk1 coordinates the DNA damage response (DDR) and cell cycle checkpoint response.[3] Activation of Chk1 results in the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and cell death to prevent damaged cells from progressing through the cell cycle.

Discovery

In 1993, Beach and associates initially identified Chk1 as a serine/threonine kinase which regulates the G2/M phase transition in fission yeast.[4] Constitutive expression of Chk1 in fission yeast was shown to induce cell cycle arrest. The same gene called Rad27 was identified in budding yeast by Carr and associates. In 1997, homologs were identified in more complex organisms including the fruit fly, human and mouse.[5] Through these findings, it is apparent Chk1 is highly conserved from yeast to humans.[1]

Structure

Human Chk1 is located on chromosome 11 on the cytogenic band 11q22-23. Chk1 has a N-terminal kinase domain, a linker region, a regulatory SQ/TQ domain and a C-terminal domain.[5] Chk1 contains four Ser/Gln residues.[4] Chk 1 activation occurs primarily through the phosphorylation of the conserved sites, Ser-317, Ser-345 and less often at Ser-366.[4][6]

Function

Checkpoint kinases (Chks) are protein kinases that are involved in cell cycle control. Two checkpoint kinase subtypes have been identified, Chk1 and Chk2. Chk1 is a central component of genome surveillance pathways and is a key regulator of the cell cycle and cell survival. Chk1 is required for the initiation of DNA damage checkpoints and has recently been shown to play a role in the normal (unperturbed) cell cycle.[5] Chk1 impacts various stages of the cell cycle including the S phase, G2/M transition and M phase.[4]

In addition to mediating cell cycle checkpoints, Chk1 also contributes to DNA repair processes, gene transcription, embryo development, cellular responses to HIV infection and somatic cell viability.[4]

S phase

Chk1 is essential for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Chk1 monitors DNA replication in unperturbed cell cycles and responds to genotoxic stress if present.[5] Chk1 recognizes DNA strand instability during replication and can stall DNA replication in order to allow time for DNA repair mechanisms to restore the genome.[4] Recently, Chk1 has shown to mediate DNA repair mechanisms and does so by activating various repair factors. Furthermore, Chk1 has been associated with three particular aspects of the S-phase, which includes the regulation of late origin firing, controlling the elongation process and maintenance of DNA replication fork stability.[4]

G2/M transition

In response to DNA damage, Chk1 is an important signal transducer for G2/M checkpoint activation. Activation of Chk1 holds the cell in the G2 phase until ready to enter the mitotic phase. This delay allows time for DNA to repair or cell death to occur if DNA damage is irreversible.[7] Chk1 must inactivate in order for the cell to transition from the G2 phase into mitosis, Chk1 expression levels are mediated by regulatory proteins.

M phase

Chk1 has a regulatory role in the spindle checkpoint however the relationship is less clear as compared to checkpoints in other cell cycle stages. During this phase the Chk1 activating element of ssDNA can not be generated suggesting an alternate form of activation. Studies on Chk1 deficient chicken lymphoma cells have shown increased levels of genomic instability and failure to arrest during the spindle checkpoint phase in mitosis.[4] Furthermore, haploinsufficient mammary epithelial cells illustrated misaligned chromosomes and abnormal segregation. These studies suggest Chk1 depletion can lead to defects in the spindle checkpoint resulting in mitotic abnormalities.

Interactions

DNA damage induces the activation of Chk1 which facilitates the initiation of the DNA damage response (DDR) and cell cycle checkpoints. The DNA damage response is a network of signaling pathways that leads to activation of checkpoints, DNA repair and apoptosis to inhibit damaged cells from progressing through the cell cycle.

Chk1 activation

Chk1 is regulated by ATR through phosphorylation, forming the ATR-Chk1 pathway. This pathway recognizes single strand DNA (ssDNA) which can be a result of UV-induced damage, replication stress and inter-strand cross linking.[4][5] Often ssDNA can be a result of abnormal replication during S phase through the uncoupling of replication enzymes helicase and DNA polymerase.[4] These ssDNA structures attract ATR and eventually activates the checkpoint pathway.

However, activation of Chk1 is not solely dependent on ATR, intermediate proteins involved in DNA replication are often necessary. Regulatory proteins such as replication protein A, Claspin, Tim/Tipin, Rad 17, TopBP1 may be involved to facilitate Chk1 activation. Additional protein interactions are involved to induce maximal phosphorylation of Chk1. Chk1 activation can also be ATR-independent through interactions with other protein kinases such as PKB/AKT, MAPKAPK and p90/RSK.[4]

Also, Chk1 has been shown to be activated by the Scc1 subunit of the protein cohesin, in zygotes.[8]

Cell cycle arrest

Chk1 interacts with many downstream effectors to induce cell cycle arrest. In response to DNA damage, Chk1 primarily phosphorylates Cdc25 which results in its proteasomal degradation.[5] The degradation has an inhibitory effect on the formation of cyclin-dependent kinase complexes, which are key drivers of the cell cycle.[9] Through targeting Cdc25, cell cycle arrest can occur at multiple time points including the G1/S transition, S phase and G2/M transition.[4] Furthermore, Chk1 can target Cdc25 indirectly through phosphorylating Nek11.

WEE1 kinase and PLK1 are also targeted by Chk1 to induce cell cycle arrest. Phosphorylation of WEE1 kinase inhibits cdk1 which results in cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase.[4]

Chk1 has a role in the spindle checkpoint during mitosis thus interacts with spindle assembly proteins Aurora A kinase and Aurora B kinase.[5]

DNA repair

Recently, Chk1 has shown to mediate DNA repair mechanisms and does so by activating repair factors such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), FANCE, Rad51 and TLK.[4] Chk1 facilitates replication fork stabilization during DNA replication and repair however more research is necessary to define the underlying interactions.[5]

Clinical relevance

Chk1 has a central role in coordinating the DNA damage response and therefore is an area of great interest in oncology and the development of cancer therapeutics.[10] Initially Chk1 was thought to function as a tumor suppressor due to the regulatory role it serves amongst cells with DNA damage. However, there has been no evidence of homozygous loss of function mutants for Chk1 in human tumors.[4] Instead, Chk1 has been shown to be overexpressed in a numerous tumors including breast, colon, liver, gastric and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.[4] There is a positive correlation with Chk1 expression and tumor grade and disease recurrence suggesting Chk1 may promote tumor growth.[4][5][10] Chk1 is essential for cell survival and through high levels of expressions in tumors the function may be inducing tumor cell proliferation. Further, a study has demonstrated that targeting CHK1 reactivates the tumour suppressive activity of protein phosphtase 2A (PP2A) complex in cancer cells.[11] Studies have shown complete loss of Chk1 suppresses chemically induce carcinogenesis however Chk1 haploinsufficiency results in tumor progression.[5] Due to the possibility of Chk1 involvement in tumor promotion, the kinase and related signaling molecules may be potentially effective therapeutic targets. Cancer therapies utilize DNA damaging therapies such as chemotherapies and ionizing radiation to inhibit tumor cell proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest.[12] Tumor cells with increased levels of Chk1 acquire survival advantages due to the ability to tolerate a higher level of DNA damage. Therefore, Chk1 may contribute to chemotherapy resistance.[13] In order to optimize chemotherapies, Chk1 must be inhibited to reduce the survival advantage.[3] Chk1 gene can be effectively silenced by siRNA knockdown for further analysis based on an independent validation.[14] By inhibiting Chk1, cancer cells lose the ability to repair damaged DNA which allows chemotherapeutic agents to work more effectively. Combining DNA damaging therapies such as chemotherapy or radiation treatment with Chk1 inhibition enhances targeted cell death and provides synthetic lethality.[15] Many cancers rely on Chk1 mediated cell cycle arrest heavily especially if cancers are deficient in p53.[16] Approximately 50% of cancers possess p53 mutations illustrating the dependence that many cancers may have on the Chk1 pathway.[17][18][19] Inhibition of Chk1 allows selective targeting of p53 mutant cells as Chk1 levels are more likely to highly expressed in tumor cells with p53 deficiencies.[10][20] Even though this method of inhibition is highly targeted, recent research has shown Chk1 also has a role in the normal cell cycle.[21] Therefore, off-target effects and toxicity associated with combination therapies using CHk1 inhibitors must be considered during development of novel therapies.[22]

Meiosis

During meiosis in human and mouse, CHEK1 protein kinase is important for integrating DNA damage repair with cell cycle arrest.[23] CHEK1 is expressed in the testes and associates with meiotic synaptonemal complexes during the zygonema and pachynema stages.[23] CHEK1 likely acts as an integrator for ATM and ATR signals and may be involved in monitoring meiotic recombination.[23] In mouse oocytes CHEK1 appears to be indispensable for prophase I arrest and to function at the G2/M checkpoint.[24]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, Richman R, Wu Z, Piwnica-Worms H, Elledge SJ (September 1997). "Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25". Science. 277 (5331): 1497–501. doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1497. PMID 9278511.
  2. Flaggs G, Plug AW, Dunks KM, Mundt KE, Ford JC, Quiggle MR, Taylor EM, Westphal CH, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF, Carr AM (December 1997). "Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes". Current Biology. 7 (12): 977–86. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00417-9. PMID 9382850.
  3. 3.0 3.1 McNeely S, Beckmann R, Bence Lin AK (April 2014). "CHEK again: revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy". Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 142 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.005. PMID 24140082.
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 Zhang Y, Hunter T (March 2014). "Roles of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer therapy". International Journal of Cancer. 134 (5): 1013–23. doi:10.1002/ijc.28226. PMC 3852170. PMID 23613359.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 Patil M, Pabla N, Dong Z (November 2013). "Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 70 (21): 4009–21. doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1307-3. PMC 3731415. PMID 23508805.
  6. Caparelli ML, O'Connell MJ (March 2013). "Regulatory motifs in Chk1". Cell Cycle. 12 (6): 916–22. doi:10.4161/cc.23881. PMC 3637350. PMID 23422000.
  7. Meuth M (September 2010). "Chk1 suppressed cell death". Cell Division. 5: 21. doi:10.1186/1747-1028-5-21. PMC 2939633. PMID 20813042.
  8. Ladstätter S, Tachibana-Konwalski K (December 2016). "A Surveillance Mechanism Ensures Repair of DNA Lesions during Zygotic Reprogramming". Cell. 167 (7): 1774–1787.e13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.009. PMC 5161750. PMID 27916276.
  9. Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, Luo G, Carattini-Rivera S, DeMayo F, Bradley A, Donehower LA, Elledge SJ (June 2000). "Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint". Genes & Development. 14 (12): 1448–59. doi:10.1101/gad.840500. PMC 316686. PMID 10859164.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Goto H, Izawa I, Li P, Inagaki M (July 2012). "Novel regulation of checkpoint kinase 1: Is checkpoint kinase 1 a good candidate for anti-cancer therapy?". Cancer Science. 103 (7): 1195–200. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02280.x. PMID 22435685.
  11. Khanna A, Kauko O, Böckelman C, Laine A, Schreck I, Partanen JI, Szwajda A, Bormann S, Bilgen T, Helenius M, Pokharel YR, Pimanda J, Russel MR, Haglund C, Cole KA, Klefström J, Aittokallio T, Weiss C, Ristimäki A, Visakorpi T, Westermarck J (November 2013). "Chk1 targeting reactivates PP2A tumor suppressor activity in cancer cells". Cancer Research. 73 (22): 6757–69. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1002. PMC 3870284. PMID 24072747.
  12. Smith J, Tho LM, Xu N, Gillespie DA (2010). The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. Advances in Cancer Research. 108. pp. 73–112. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0. ISBN 9780123808882. PMID 21034966.
  13. Liang Y, Lin SY, Brunicardi FC, Goss J, Li K (April 2009). "DNA damage response pathways in tumor suppression and cancer treatment". World Journal of Surgery. 33 (4): 661–6. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9840-1. PMID 19034564.
  14. Munkácsy G, Sztupinszki Z, Herman P, Bán B, Pénzváltó Z, Szarvas N, Győrffy B (September 2016). "Validation of RNAi Silencing Efficiency Using Gene Array Data shows 18.5% Failure Rate across 429 Independent Experiments". Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids. 5 (9): e366. doi:10.1038/mtna.2016.66. PMC 5056990. PMID 27673562.
  15. Toledo LI, Murga M, Fernandez-Capetillo O (August 2011). "Targeting ATR and Chk1 kinases for cancer treatment: a new model for new (and old) drugs". Molecular Oncology. 5 (4): 368–73. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2011.07.002. PMC 3590794. PMID 21820372.
  16. Chen Z, Xiao Z, Gu WZ, Xue J, Bui MH, Kovar P, Li G, Wang G, Tao ZF, Tong Y, Lin NH, Sham HL, Wang JY, Sowin TJ, Rosenberg SH, Zhang H (December 2006). "Selective Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize p53-deficient cancer cells to cancer therapeutics". International Journal of Cancer. 119 (12): 2784–94. doi:10.1002/ijc.22198. PMID 17019715.
  17. Maugeri-Saccà M, Bartucci M, De Maria R (August 2013). "Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors for potentiating systemic anticancer therapy". Cancer Treatment Reviews. 39 (5): 525–33. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.10.007. PMID 23207059.
  18. Tao ZF, Lin NH (July 2006). "Chk1 inhibitors for novel cancer treatment". Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 6 (4): 377–88. doi:10.2174/187152006777698132. PMID 16842237.
  19. Ma CX, Janetka JW, Piwnica-Worms H (February 2011). "Death by releasing the breaks: CHK1 inhibitors as cancer therapeutics". Trends in Molecular Medicine. 17 (2): 88–96. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.009. PMID 21087899.
  20. Zenvirt S, Kravchenko-Balasha N, Levitzki A (November 2010). "Status of p53 in human cancer cells does not predict efficacy of CHK1 kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapeutic agents". Oncogene. 29 (46): 6149–59. doi:10.1038/onc.2010.343. PMID 20729914.
  21. Thompson R, Eastman A (September 2013). "The cancer therapeutic potential of Chk1 inhibitors: how mechanistic studies impact on clinical trial design". British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 76 (3): 358–69. doi:10.1111/bcp.12139. PMC 3769664. PMID 23593991.
  22. Dent P, Tang Y, Yacoub A, Dai Y, Fisher PB, Grant S (April 2011). "CHK1 inhibitors in combination chemotherapy: thinking beyond the cell cycle". Molecular Interventions. 11 (2): 133–40. doi:10.1124/mi.11.2.11. PMC 3109860. PMID 21540473.
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 Flaggs G, Plug AW, Dunks KM, Mundt KE, Ford JC, Quiggle MR, Taylor EM, Westphal CH, Ashley T, Hoekstra MF, Carr AM (December 1997). "Atm-dependent interactions of a mammalian chk1 homolog with meiotic chromosomes". Current Biology. 7 (12): 977–86. doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00417-9. PMID 9382850.
  24. Chen L, Chao SB, Wang ZB, Qi ST, Zhu XL, Yang SW, Yang CR, Zhang QH, Ouyang YC, Hou Y, Schatten H, Sun QY (May 2012). "Checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for meiotic cell cycle regulation in mouse oocytes". Cell Cycle. 11 (10): 1948–55. doi:10.4161/cc.20279. PMID 22544319.

Further reading

External links