Circadian control element gene transcriptions: Difference between revisions
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
# CCEr3ci: GATGGATTTG at 3780. | # CCEr3ci: GATGGATTTG at 3780. | ||
# CCEr5ci: GATTGCCTTG at 3319. | # CCEr5ci: GATTGCCTTG at 3319. | ||
==Response element analysis and results== | |||
{{main|Complex locus A1BG and ZNF497#Name of elements}} | |||
==Acknowledgements== | ==Acknowledgements== |
Revision as of 23:17, 24 January 2022
Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Henry A. Hoff
"The circadian control element (circadian; Anderson et al., 1994) was found in 10 FvTCP genes."[1]
Consensus sequences
Circadian control elements (CAANNNNATC).[2]
Hypotheses
- A1BG has no CCEs in either promoter.
- A1BG is not transcribed by a CCE.
- CCE does not participate in the transcription of A1BG.
Samplings
Copying the consensus of the CCE: 5'-CAACTTTA-3' and putting the sequence in "⌘F" finds no locations between ZSCAN22 and A1BG and no locations between ZNF497 and A1BG as can be found by the computer programs.
For the Basic programs testing consensus sequence 5'-CAANNNNATC-3' (starting with SuccessablesCCE.bas) written to compare nucleotide sequences with the sequences on either the template strand (-), or coding strand (+), of the DNA, in the negative direction (-), or the positive direction (+), the programs are, are looking for, and found:
- negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
- negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
- positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
- positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
- complement, negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
- complement, negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
- complement, positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
- complement, positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
- inverse complement, negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 0.
- inverse complement, negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 0.
- inverse complement, positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 1, 5'-GATGGGGTTG-3' at 3804.
- inverse complement, positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 0.
- inverse negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 1, 5'-CTACCCCAAC-3' at 3804.
- inverse negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.
- inverse positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.
- inverse positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.
CCE UTR promoters
Negative strand, negative direction: CTACCCCAAC at 3804.
CCE random dataset samplings
- CCEr0: 1, CAAGGGTATC at 334.
- CCEr1: 0.
- CCEr2: 2, CAACCGAATC at 2991, CAAACCGATC at 1749.
- CCEr3: 2, CAATCGCATC at 1734, CAAATGCATC at 162.
- CCEr4: 1, CAACGTCATC at 3915.
- CCEr5: 1, CAATGACATC at 2923.
- CCEr6: 2, CAACAATATC at 2053, CAAGGACATC at 793.
- CCEr7: 0.
- CCEr8: 1, CAACTCTATC at 1916.
- CCEr9: 0.
- CCEr0ci: 0.
- CCEr1ci: 4, GATACAGTTG at 3388, GATGACTTTG at 1638, GATTCCTTTG at 712, GATGTGCTTG at 351.
- CCEr2ci: 0.
- CCEr3ci: 2, GATTTCCTTG at 4300, GATGGATTTG at 3780.
- CCEr4ci: 0.
- CCEr5ci: 1, GATTGCCTTG at 3319.
- CCEr6ci: 0.
- CCEr7ci: 0.
- CCEr8ci: 0.
- CCEr9ci: 0.
CCEr UTRs
- CCEr2: CAACCGAATC at 2991.
- CCEr4: CAACGTCATC at 3915.
CCEr core promoters
- CCEr3ci: GATTTCCTTG at 4300.
CCEr distal promoters
- CCEr0: CAAGGGTATC at 334.
- CCEr2: CAAACCGATC at 1749.
- CCEr6: CAACAATATC at 2053, CAAGGACATC at 793.
- CCEr8: CAACTCTATC at 1916.
- CCEr3: CAATCGCATC at 1734, CAAATGCATC at 162.
- CCEr5: CAATGACATC at 2923.
- CCEr1ci: GATACAGTTG at 3388, GATGACTTTG at 1638, GATTCCTTTG at 712, GATGTGCTTG at 351.
- CCEr3ci: GATGGATTTG at 3780.
- CCEr5ci: GATTGCCTTG at 3319.
Response element analysis and results
Acknowledgements
The content on this page was first contributed by: Henry A. Hoff.
See also
References
- ↑ Wei Wei, Yang Hu, Meng-Yuan Cui, Yong-Tao Han, Kuan Gao, and Jia-Yue Feng (22 December 2016). "Identification and Transcript Analysis of the TCP Transcription Factors in the Diploid Woodland Strawberry Fragaria vesca". Frontiers in Plant Science. 7: 1937. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01937. PMID 28066489. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
- ↑ Bhaskar Sharma & Joemar Taganna (12 June 2020). "Genome-wide analysis of the U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase enzyme gene family in tomato". Scientific Reports. 10 (9581). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66553-1. PMID 32533036 Check
|pmid=
value (help). Retrieved 27 August 2020.